» Articles » PMID: 28627241

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Layout and Nurses' Work

Overview
Journal HERD
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Jun 20
PMID 28627241
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) remain one of the few areas in hospitals that still use an open bay (OPBY) design for patient stays greater than 24 hr, housing multiple infants, staff, and families in one large room. This creates high noise levels, contributes to the spread of infection, and affords families little privacy. These problems have given rise to the single-family room NICU. This represents a significant change in the care environment for nurses. This literature review answers the question: When compared to OPBY layout, how does a single family room layout impact neonatal nurses' work? Thirteen studies published between 2006 and 2015 were located. Many studies reported both positive and negative effects on nurses' work and were therefore sorted by their cited advantages and disadvantages. Advantages included improved quality of the physical environment; improved quality of patient care; improved parent interaction; and improvements in nurse job satisfaction, stress, and burnout. Disadvantages included decreased interaction among the NICU patient care team, increased nurse workload, decreased visibility on the unit, and difficult interactions with family. This review suggests that single-family room NICUs introduce a complex situation in which trade-offs occur for nurses, most prominently the trade-off between visibility and privacy. Additionally, the literature is clear on what elements of nurses' work are impacted, but how the built environment influences these elements, and how these elements interact during nurses' work, is not as well understood. The current level of research and directions for future research are also discussed.

Citing Articles

Ten Years of Neonatal Intensive Care Adaption to the Infants' Needs: Implementation of a Family-Centered Care Model with Single-Family Rooms in Norway.

Lyngstad L, Le Marechal F, Ekeberg B, Hochnowski K, Hval M, Tandberg B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(10).

PMID: 35627454 PMC: 9140644. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19105917.


Elucidating the context for implementing nonpharmacologic care for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome: a qualitative study of perinatal nurses.

Shuman C, Wilson R, VanAntwerp K, Morgan M, Weber A BMC Pediatr. 2021; 21(1):489.

PMID: 34736443 PMC: 8567648. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-02955-y.


Development and use of an adjusted nurse staffing metric in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Tawfik D, Profit J, Lake E, Liu J, Sanders L, Phibbs C Health Serv Res. 2019; 55(2):190-200.

PMID: 31869865 PMC: 7080382. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13249.


Psychosocial support for parents of extremely preterm infants in neonatal intensive care: a qualitative interview study.

Bry A, Wigert H BMC Psychol. 2019; 7(1):76.

PMID: 31783784 PMC: 6883543. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-019-0354-4.


The heuristics of nurse responsiveness to critical patient monitor and ventilator alarms in a private room neonatal intensive care unit.

Joshi R, van de Mortel H, Feijs L, Andriessen P, van Pul C PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0184567.

PMID: 28981515 PMC: 5628801. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184567.