» Articles » PMID: 28616112

Choosing the Right Sling for Your Patient

Overview
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Jun 16
PMID 28616112
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent data has demonstrated a one in five lifetime risk of a woman requiring stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery. Currently, most women opt for a synthetic midurethral sling (MUS), with over 3.6 million placed worldwide. This article attempts to identify whether a gold standard exists with regards to surgical correction of female SUI. When considering which sling type to use for which incontinent woman, the published data demonstrates excellent results for both synthetic mesh (retropubic or transobturator routes) and fascial pubovaginal slings for most patients. Intrinsic sphincter deficiency does appear to be better treated with the use of a retropubic approach, although still with less than stellar results. With little to differentiate, the treatment of most female SUI may be solely based on which sling the surgeon feels most comfortable performing. Currently, most urologists and gynecologists favour synthetic MUS over fascial slings in surgical-naïve patients; however, recent U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warnings concerning the use of mesh in transvaginal surgery have patients questioning the safety of synthetic MUS for the treatment of SUI.

Citing Articles

Midurethral Sling Mesh Exposure Confers a High Risk of Persistent Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Siblini T, Baracy M, Kulkarni S, Mabis C, Hagglund K, Aslam M Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 35(6):1177-1182.

PMID: 38703222 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05762-y.

References
1.
Novara G, Artibani W, Barber M, Chapple C, Costantini E, Ficarra V . Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2010; 58(2):218-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.022. View

2.
Wu J, Matthews C, Conover M, Pate V, Funk M . Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(6):1201-1206. PMC: 4174312. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000286. View

3.
Nager C . Midurethral slings: evidence-based medicine vs the medicolegal system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214(6):708.e1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.018. View

4.
Jeon M, Jung H, Chung S, Kim S, Bai S . Comparison of the treatment outcome of pubovaginal sling, tension-free vaginal tape, and transobturator tape for stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199(1):76.e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.060. View

5.
Miranda V, Pineda R, Lovatsis D, Alarab M, Drutz H . Efficacy and safety of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape among obese women with stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012; 34(8):755-759. DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35339-7. View