» Articles » PMID: 28609430

Polymorphisms in CYP2C9 Are Associated with Response to Indomethacin Among Neonates with Patent Ductus Arteriosus

Overview
Journal Pediatr Res
Specialties Biology
Pediatrics
Date 2017 Jun 14
PMID 28609430
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BackgroundPatent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a common complication seen in preterm infants. Indomethacin is routinely used to treat PDA. Evidence suggests that the response of indomethacin is highly heritable. This study investigated the association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CYP2C9 and the closure of PDA in response to indomethacin.MethodsSix SNPs in CYP2C9 were analyzed for association with indomethacin response. A case-control analysis was performed among neonates who responded to indomethacin (responders) and among those who required surgical ligation (non-responders). Independent transmission disequilibrium tests were performed among parent-child trios of responders and non-responders.ResultsThe G allele of rs2153628 was associated with increased odds of response to indomethacin in the case-control analysis (odds ratios (OR): 1.918, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.056, 3.483). Among indomethacin responders, the G allele of rs2153628 and the T allele of rs1799853 were overtransmitted from the parents to their child (OR: 2.667, 95% CI: 1.374, 5.177 and OR: 2.375, 95% CI: 1.040, 5.425, respectively), consistent with the case-control analysis.ConclusionWe identified an association between two SNPs in CYP2C9, rs2153628 and rs1799853, and indomethacin response for the treatment of PDA. These findings suggest that response to indomethacin in the closure of PDA may be influenced by polymorphisms associated with altered indomethacin metabolism.

Citing Articles

Association between endotypes of prematurity and pharmacological closure of patent ductus arteriosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gonzalez-Luis G, Borges-Lujan M, Villamor E Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1078506.

PMID: 36937978 PMC: 10020634. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1078506.


Patent Ductus Arteriosus: A Contemporary Perspective for the Pediatric and Adult Cardiac Care Provider.

Backes C, Hill K, Shelton E, Slaughter J, Lewis T, Weisz D J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(17):e025784.

PMID: 36056734 PMC: 9496432. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025784.


The Impact of Pharmacogenetics on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Neonates and Infants: A Systematic Review.

Yalcin N, Flint R, van Schaik R, Simons S, Allegaert K Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2022; 15:675-696.

PMID: 35795337 PMC: 9252316. DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S350205.


Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Remodeling of Ductus Arteriosus: Looking beyond the Prostaglandin Pathway.

Hsu H, Lin T, Liu Y, Yeh J, Hsu J Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(6).

PMID: 33810164 PMC: 8005123. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22063238.


Early Urinary Metabolomics in Patent Ductus Arteriosus Anticipates the Fate: Preliminary Data.

Bardanzellu F, Piras C, Atzei A, Neroni P, Fanos V Front Pediatr. 2021; 8:613749.

PMID: 33409262 PMC: 7779766. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.613749.


References
1.
Gersony W, Peckham G, Ellison R, Miettinen O, NADAS A . Effects of indomethacin in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus: results of a national collaborative study. J Pediatr. 1983; 102(6):895-906. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(83)80022-5. View

2.
Hajj H, Dagle J . Genetics of patent ductus arteriosus susceptibility and treatment. Semin Perinatol. 2012; 36(2):98-104. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.09.019. View

3.
de Bakker P, Yelensky R, Peer I, Gabriel S, Daly M, Altshuler D . Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nat Genet. 2005; 37(11):1217-23. DOI: 10.1038/ng1669. View

4.
Dagle J, Lepp N, Cooper M, Schaa K, Kelsey K, Orr K . Determination of genetic predisposition to patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(4):1116-23. PMC: 2734952. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-0313. View

5.
King B, Khan T, Aithal G, Kamali F, Daly A . Upstream and coding region CYP2C9 polymorphisms: correlation with warfarin dose and metabolism. Pharmacogenetics. 2004; 14(12):813-22. DOI: 10.1097/00008571-200412000-00004. View