An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm

We assess progress toward the protection of 50% of the terrestrial biosphere to address the species-extinction crisis and conserve a global ecological heritage for future generations. Using a map of Earth's 846 terrestrial ecoregions, we show that 98 ecoregions (12%) exceed Half Protected; 313 ecoregions (37%) fall short of Half Protected but have sufficient unaltered habitat remaining to reach the target; and 207 ecoregions (24%) are in peril, where an average of only 4% of natural habitat remains. We propose a Global Deal for Nature-a companion to the Paris Climate Deal-to promote increased habitat protection and restoration, national- and ecoregion-scale conservation strategies, and the empowerment of indigenous peoples to protect their sovereign lands. The goal of such an accord would be to protect half the terrestrial realm by 2050 to halt the extinction crisis while sustaining human livelihoods.

Citing Articles

CaecilianTraits, an individual level trait database of Caecilians worldwide.

Wei P, Song Y, Tian R, Wang Y, Chen J, Yuan Z Sci Data. 2025; 12(1):428.

PMID: 40074756 PMC: 11903681. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-04728-z.

Canopy functional trait variation across Earth's tropical forests.

Aguirre-Gutierrez J, Rifai S, Deng X, Ter Steege H, Thomson E, Corral-Rivas J Nature. 2025; .

PMID: 40044867 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08663-2.

Taxonomic diversity and abundance of enchytraeids (Annelida, Clitellata, Enchytraeida) in the Northern Palaearctic. 2. European Russia.

Saifutdinov R, Degtyarev M, Korobushkin D, Artemieva S, Byzov P, Danilova M Biodivers Data J. 2025; 13:e144992.

PMID: 40041551 PMC: 11876978. DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.13.e144992.

Analysis of changes in temperature and precipitation in South American countries and ecoregions: Comparison between reference conditions and three representative concentration pathways for 2050.

Veneros J, Hansen A, Jantz P, Roberts D, Noguera-Urbano E, Garcia L Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):e42459.

PMID: 40034275 PMC: 11872500. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42459.

SeasFire cube - a multivariate dataset for global wildfire modeling.

Karasante I, Alonso L, Prapas I, Ahuja A, Carvalhais N, Papoutsis I Sci Data. 2025; 12(1):368.

PMID: 40032880 PMC: 11876342. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-04546-3.

References

Balmford A, Gaston K, Blyth S, James A, Kapos V . Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(3):1046-50. PMC: 298723. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0236945100. View

Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort B . Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(50):20260-4. PMC: 3250154. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108. View

Ellis E, Kaplan J, Fuller D, Vavrus S, Goldewijk K, Verburg P . Used planet: a global history. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(20):7978-85. PMC: 3657770. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1217241110. View

Venter O, Sanderson E, Magrach A, Allan J, Beher J, Jones K . Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:12558. PMC: 4996975. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12558. View

Mora C, Tittensor D, Adl S, Simpson A, Worm B . How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean?. PLoS Biol. 2011; 9(8):e1001127. PMC: 3160336. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127. View

Myers N, Mittermeier R, Mittermeier C, da Fonseca G, Kent J . Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000; 403(6772):853-8. DOI: 10.1038/35002501. View

Naidoo R, Weaver L, Diggle R, Matongo G, Stuart-Hill G, Thouless C . Complementary benefits of tourism and hunting to communal conservancies in Namibia. Conserv Biol. 2015; 30(3):628-38. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12643. View

Noss R, Dobson A, Baldwin R, Beier P, Davis C, DellaSala D . Bolder thinking for conservation. Conserv Biol. 2012; 26(1):1-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01738.x. View

Melillo J, Lu X, Kicklighter D, Reilly J, Cai Y, Sokolov A . Protected areas' role in climate-change mitigation. Ambio. 2015; 45(2):133-45. PMC: 4752559. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0693-1. View

10.

McCarthy D, Donald P, Scharlemann J, Buchanan G, Balmford A, Green J . Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs. Science. 2012; 338(6109):946-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1229803. View

11.

Coetzee B, Gaston K, Chown S . Local scale comparisons of biodiversity as a test for global protected area ecological performance: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(8):e105824. PMC: 4146549. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105824. View

12.

Balmford A, Gravestock P, Hockley N, McClean C, Roberts C . The worldwide costs of marine protected areas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(26):9694-7. PMC: 470737. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0403239101. View

13.

Margules C, Pressey R . Systematic conservation planning. Nature. 2000; 405(6783):243-53. DOI: 10.1038/35012251. View

14.

Gray C, Hill S, Newbold T, Hudson L, Borger L, Contu S . Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:12306. PMC: 4974472. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12306. View

15.

Hansen M, Potapov P, MOORE R, Hancher M, Turubanova S, Tyukavina A . High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science. 2013; 342(6160):850-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1244693. View