» Articles » PMID: 28607668

Future Perspectives on Nonmedical Prescribing

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2017 Jun 14
PMID 28607668
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many countries have implemented nonmedical prescribing (NMP) and many others are scoping prescribing practices with a view to developing NMP. This paper provides a future perspective on NMP in light of findings of an umbrella review of aspects of NMP. This is followed by coverage of the Scottish Government strategy of pharmacist prescribing and finally, consideration of two key challenges. The review identified seven systematic reviews of influences on prescribing decision-making, processes of prescribing, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Decision making was reported as complex with many, and often conflicting, influences. Facilitators of NMP included perceived improved patient care and professional autonomy, while barriers included lack of defined roles and resource pressures. Three systematic reviews explored patient outcomes that were noted to be equivalent or better to physician prescribing. In particular, a Cochrane review of 46 studies of clinical, patient-reported, and resource-use outcomes of NMP compared with medical prescribing showed positive intervention-group effects. Despite positive findings, authors highlighted high bias, poor definition and description of 'prescribing' and the 'prescribing process' and difficulty in separating NMP effects from the contributions of other healthcare team members. While evidence of benefit and safety is essential to inform practice, for NMP to be implemented and sustained on a large scale, there needs to be clear commitment at the highest level. The approach being taken by the Scottish Government to pharmacist prescribing implementation may inform developments in other professions and countries. The vision is that by 2023, all pharmacists providing pharmaceutical care will be pharmacist-independent prescribers. There are, however, challenges to implementing NMP into working practice; two key challenges are the need for sustainable models of care and evaluation research. These challenges could be met by considering the theoretical basis for implementation, and robust and rigorous evaluation.

Citing Articles

Pharmacists' perspectives on potential pharmacist prescribing: a nationwide survey in the Netherlands.

Kaymakci B, Philbert D, Hazen A, Heringa M, Kwint H, Zwart D Int J Clin Pharm. 2024; .

PMID: 39616290 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01842-7.


A qualitative, theory-based exploration of facilitators and barriers for implementation of pharmacist prescribing in chronic kidney disease.

Al Raiisi F, Cunningham S, Stewart D Int J Clin Pharm. 2024; 46(6):1482-1491.

PMID: 39230784 PMC: 11576801. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01794-y.


Implementation of Nurse Prescriptions throughout the Public Health System in Catalonia (2021-2022).

Bayot I Escardivol R, Mateo-Viladomat E, Galbany-Estragues P, Vilar-Pont M, Caldero I Sole M, Mora-Lopez G Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 38921348 PMC: 11204069. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12121232.


Survey on barriers to psychiatrists' use of clozapine for young people in Scotland and suggestions for reducing these.

Walker G, Lang J, Smith H PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0304996.

PMID: 38900758 PMC: 11189218. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304996.


Investigating practice integration of independent prescribing by community pharmacists using normalization process theory: a cross-sectional survey.

Karim L, McIntosh T, Jebara T, Pfleger D, Osprey A, Cunningham S Int J Clin Pharm. 2024; 46(4):966-976.

PMID: 38727778 PMC: 11286670. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01733-x.


References
1.
Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey C, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P . Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13(3):132-40. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055. View

2.
Stewart D, MacLure K, George J . Educating nonmedical prescribers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 74(4):662-7. PMC: 3477334. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04204.x. View

3.
Darvishpour A, Joolaee S, Cheraghi M . A meta-synthesis study of literature review and systematic review published in nurse prescribing. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014; 28:77. PMC: 4219909. View

4.
Lewis P, Dornan T, Taylor D, Tully M, Wass V, Ashcroft D . Prevalence, incidence and nature of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2009; 32(5):379-89. DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200932050-00002. View

5.
Kroezen M, van Dijk L, Groenewegen P, Francke A . Nurse prescribing of medicines in Western European and Anglo-Saxon countries: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11:127. PMC: 3141384. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-127. View