» Articles » PMID: 28607416

Neural Correlates Underlying Size Constancy in Virtual Three-Dimensional Space

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jun 14
PMID 28607416
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The perceived size of an object remains relatively constant although its retinal size keeps decreasing as the object moves away along the depth dimension of the 3D space, i.e. size constancy. Neural mechanisms generating size constancy in virtual 3D space, however, remain poorly understood. By constructing a virtual 3D world in the MR scanner, we positioned the same 3D objects either near or far from the observers so that the near and far objects were perceived as having the same physical size despite their differences in retinal size. To control for the effect of differential retinal size, an additional 2D condition was introduced: a large and a small object, with matched retinal images as the near and far objects in the 3D condition, respectively, were presented on a 2D screen. Differences in retinal size activated overlapped areas in bilateral inferior occipital gyrus (IOG) in both experiments. The overlapped areas in IOG, however, showed different patterns of functional connectivity with different neural networks, depending on the perceived size of objects. In particular, IOG showed enhanced connectivity with bilateral superior parietal cortex in the 2D condition, but with inferior temporal and prefrontal cortex in the virtual 3D condition, i.e., size constancy.

Citing Articles

Dynamic Corridor Illusion in Pigeons: Humanlike Pictorial Cue Precedence Over Motion Parallax Cue in Size Perception.

Hataji Y, Kuroshima H, Fujita K Iperception. 2020; 11(2):2041669520911408.

PMID: 32269745 PMC: 7093692. DOI: 10.1177/2041669520911408.

References
1.
Ono H . Distal and proximal size under reduced and non-reduced viewing conditions. Am J Psychol. 1966; 79(2):234-41. View

2.
Bar M, Tootell R, Schacter D, Greve D, Fischl B, Mendola J . Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition. Neuron. 2001; 29(2):529-35. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00224-0. View

3.
Bar M, Kassam K, Ghuman A, Boshyan J, Schmid A, Schmidt A . Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(2):449-54. PMC: 1326160. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507062103. View

4.
Sawamura H, Georgieva S, Vogels R, Vanduffel W, Orban G . Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess adaptation and size invariance of shape processing by humans and monkeys. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(17):4294-306. PMC: 6725102. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0377-05.2005. View

5.
Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H . Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 83(5):2580-601. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2580. View