» Articles » PMID: 28603683

Cavernous Sinus Involvement by Pituitary Adenomas: Clinical Implications and Outcomes of Endoscopic Endonasal Resection

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2017 Jun 13
PMID 28603683
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 Parasellar invasion of pituitary adenomas (PAs) into the cavernous sinus (CS) is common. The management of the CS component of PA remains controversial.  The objective of this study was to analyze CS involvement in PA treated with endoscopic endonasal approaches, including incidence, surgical risks, surgical strategies, long-term outcomes, and our treatment algorithm.  We reviewed a series of 176 surgically treated PA with particular attention to CS involvement and whether the CS tumor was approached medial or lateral to the internal carotid artery.  The median duration of follow-up was 36 months. Macroadenomas and nonfunctional adenomas represented 77 and 60% of cases, respectively. CS invasion was documented in 23% of cases. CS involvement was associated with a significantly diminished odds of gross total resection (47 vs. 86%, odds ratio [OR]: 5.2) and increased the need for subsequent intervention (4 vs. 40%, OR: 14.4). Hormonal remission was achieved in 15% of hormonally active tumors. Rates of surgical complication were similar regardless of CS involvement.  Our tailored strategy beginning with a medial approach and adding lateral exposure as needed resulted in good outcomes with low morbidity in nonfunctional adenomas. Functional adenomas involving the CS were associated with low rates of hormonal remission necessitating higher rates of additional treatment.

Citing Articles

Real-time intraoperative ultrasound imaging of the posterior pituitary gland during endoscopic endonasal approach.

Juncker R, Finger G, Damante M, Prevedello L, Prevedello D, Wu K Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024; 166(1):456.

PMID: 39546020 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06353-y.


Clinical and therapeutic implications of cavernous sinus invasion in pituitary adenomas.

Lefevre E, Chasseloup F, Hage M, Chanson P, Buchfelder M, Kamenicky P Endocrine. 2024; 85(3):1058-1065.

PMID: 38761347 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-024-03877-2.


The Predictors of Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak in Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Surgery: The Role of Tumor Volume.

Cetinalp N, Tarkan O, Akkus G, Ozsoy K, Yildirim D, Seydaoglu G J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024; 85(3):318-324.

PMID: 38721360 PMC: 11076099. DOI: 10.1055/a-2065-6377.


Predicting the Consistency of Pituitary Macroadenomas: The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements for Surgical Planning.

Hassan R, Almalki Y, Basha M, Alduraibi S, Alshehri Hanan Hassan , Aboualkheir M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38472965 PMC: 10931207. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14050493.


Simultaneous Resection of Pituitary Adenoma and Contiguous Cavernous Sinus Meningioma: A Case Report.

Geldres F, Flores L, Huaman R, Zare A, Quispe Y Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e49106.

PMID: 38125239 PMC: 10732094. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49106.


References
1.
Demonte F, Smith H, Al-Mefty O . Outcome of aggressive removal of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 1994; 81(2):245-51. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1994.81.2.0245. View

2.
Shin M, Kurita H, Sasaki T, Tago M, Morita A, Ueki K . Stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenoma invading the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg. 2001; 93 Suppl 3:2-5. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.supplement. View

3.
Fahlbusch R, Buchfelder M . Transsphenoidal surgery of parasellar pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988; 92(1-4):93-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01401978. View

4.
Thapar K, Scheithauer B, Kovacs K, Pernicone P, Laws Jr E . p53 expression in pituitary adenomas and carcinomas: correlation with invasiveness and tumor growth fractions. Neurosurgery. 1996; 38(4):765-70; discussion 770-1. View

5.
Saeger W, Ludecke D, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Quabbe H, Petersenn S . Pathohistological classification of pituitary tumors: 10 years of experience with the German Pituitary Tumor Registry. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007; 156(2):203-16. DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.02326. View