» Articles » PMID: 28599676

A Randomized Trial of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition in Underweight and Overweight Critically Ill Patients: the TOP-UP Pilot Trial

Abstract

Background: Nutrition guidelines recommendations differ on the use of parenteral nutrition (PN), and existing clinical trial data are inconclusive. Our recent observational data show that amounts of energy/protein received early in the intensive care unit (ICU) affect patient mortality, particularly for inadequate nutrition intake in patients with body mass indices (BMIs) of <25 or >35. Thus, we hypothesized increased nutrition delivery via supplemental PN (SPN) + enteral nutrition (EN) to underweight and obese ICU patients would improve 60-day survival and quality of life (QoL) versus usual care (EN alone).

Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled pilot trial completed in 11 centers across four countries, adult ICU patients with acute respiratory failure expected to require mechanical ventilation for >72 hours and with a BMI of <25 or ≥35 were randomized to receive EN alone or SPN + EN to reach 100% of their prescribed nutrition goal for 7 days after randomization. The primary aim of this pilot trial was to achieve a 30% improvement in nutrition delivery.

Results: In total, 125 patients were enrolled. Over the first 7 post-randomization ICU days, patients in the SPN + EN arm had a 26% increase in delivered calories and protein, whereas patients in the EN-alone arm had a 22% increase (both p < 0.001). Surgical ICU patients received poorer EN nutrition delivery and had a significantly greater increase in calorie and protein delivery when receiving SPN versus medical ICU patients. SPN proved feasible to deliver with our prescribed protocol. In this pilot trial, no significant outcome differences were observed between groups, including no difference in infection risk. Potential, although statistically insignificant, trends of reduced hospital mortality and improved discharge functional outcomes and QoL outcomes in the SPN + EN group versus the EN-alone group were observed.

Conclusions: Provision of SPN + EN significantly increased calorie/protein delivery over the first week of ICU residence versus EN alone. This was achieved with no increased infection risk. Given feasibility and consistent encouraging trends in hospital mortality, QoL, and functional endpoints, a full-scale trial of SPN powered to assess these clinical outcome endpoints in high-nutritional-risk ICU patients is indicated-potentially focusing on the more poorly EN-fed surgical ICU setting.

Trial Registration: NCT01206166.

Citing Articles

Enteral Nutrition Versus a Combination of Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.

Papanikolaou P, Theodoridis X, Papaemmanouil A, Papageorgiou N, Tsankof A, Haidich A J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941660 PMC: 11818211. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030991.


The impact of a tailored nutrition intervention delivered for the duration of hospitalisation on daily energy delivery for patients with critical illness (INTENT): a phase II randomised controlled trial.

Ridley E, Bailey M, Chapman M, Chapple L, Deane A, Gojanovic M Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):8.

PMID: 39762887 PMC: 11706088. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05189-3.


Long-term outcomes in nutrition trials: after all, this is what our patients are looking for!!.

Taniguchi L, Arabi Y Intensive Care Med. 2024; 50(10):1681-1684.

PMID: 39162826 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07608-z.


Safety and quality of parenteral nutrition: Areas for improvement and future perspectives.

Monczka J, Ayers P, Berger M, Wischmeyer P Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024; 81(Supplement_3):S121-S136.

PMID: 38869258 PMC: 11170503. DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae077.


Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant infections in Intensive Care Units: a multicentre case-control study with a competing-risks analysis.

Arslan F, Akbulut E, Senbayrak S, Ozgultekin A, Aksaray S, Dal H J Prev Med Hyg. 2024; 64(4):E405-E410.

PMID: 38379741 PMC: 10876025. DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.4.2110.


References
1.
Singer P, Berger M, Van den Berghe G, Biolo G, Calder P, Forbes A . ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr. 2009; 28(4):387-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.04.024. View

2.
Doig G, Simpson F, Sweetman E, Finfer S, Cooper D, Heighes P . Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2013; 309(20):2130-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.5124. View

3.
Kreymann K, Berger M, Deutz N, Hiesmayr M, Jolliet P, Kazandjiev G . ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Intensive care. Clin Nutr. 2006; 25(2):210-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.021. View

4.
Zusman O, Theilla M, Cohen J, Kagan I, Bendavid I, Singer P . Resting energy expenditure, calorie and protein consumption in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2016; 20(1):367. PMC: 5105237. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1538-4. View

5.
Heyland D, Wischmeyer P, Day A . Glutamine and antioxidants in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(5):484-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1306658. View