» Articles » PMID: 28596743

General and Food-Specific Inhibitory Control As Moderators of the Effects of the Impulsive Systems on Food Choices

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Jun 10
PMID 28596743
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study aimed to extend the application of the reflective-impulsive model to restrained eating and explore the effect of automatic attention (impulsive system) on food choices. Furthermore, we examined the moderating effects of general inhibitory control (G-IC) and food-specific inhibitory control (F-IC) on successful and unsuccessful restrained eaters (US-REs). Automatic attention was measured using "the EyeLink 1000," which tracked eye movements during the process of making food choices, and G-IC and F-IC were measured using the Stop-Signal Task. The results showed that food choices were related to automatic attention and that G-IC and F-IC moderated the predictive relationship between automatic attention and food choices. Furthermore, among successful restrained eaters (S-REs), automatic attention to high caloric foods did not predict food choices, regardless of whether G-IC or F-IC was high or low. Whereas food choice was positively correlated with automatic attention among US-REs with poor F-IC, this pattern was not observed in those with poor G-IC. In conclusion, the S-REs had more effective self-management skills and their food choices were affected less by automatic attention and inhibitory control. Unsuccessful restrained eating was associated with poor F-IC (not G-IC) and greater automatic attention to high caloric foods. Thus, clinical interventions should focus on enhancing F-IC, not G-IC, and on reducing automatic attention to high caloric foods.

Citing Articles

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and inhibitory control training for excess weight treatment: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (InhibE).

Bernat-Villena A, Perez-Comino F, Becerra-Losada M, Algarra-Lopez L, Caracuel A, Vilar-Lopez R BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):225.

PMID: 40065421 PMC: 11895256. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02556-9.


Investigating the relationship between inhibitory control and dietary adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on subjective and objective measures.

Liu N, Heng C, Cui Y, Wu D, Li L, Bai M Nutr Diabetes. 2023; 13(1):23.

PMID: 37989739 PMC: 10663600. DOI: 10.1038/s41387-023-00252-4.


Resting state differences between successful and unsuccessful restrained eaters.

Zhang Y, Wang S, Wei L, Jackson T, Gao X, Xiao M Brain Imaging Behav. 2020; 15(2):906-916.

PMID: 32623562 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-020-00300-y.


Red for "Stop": "Traffic-Light" Nutrition Labels Decrease Unhealthy Food Choices by Increasing Activity and Connectivity in the Frontal Lobe.

Zhang X, Liu Y, Gu Y, Wang S, Chen H Nutrients. 2020; 12(1).

PMID: 31906493 PMC: 7019506. DOI: 10.3390/nu12010128.

References
1.
Hall P, Lowe C, Vincent C . Executive control resources and snack food consumption in the presence of restraining versus facilitating cues. J Behav Med. 2013; 37(4):587-94. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-013-9528-3. View

2.
Honkanen P, Olsen S, Verplanken B, Tuu H . Reflective and impulsive influences on unhealthy snacking. The moderating effects of food related self-control. Appetite. 2011; 58(2):616-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.11.019. View

3.
Lawrence N, Verbruggen F, Morrison S, Adams R, Chambers C . Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus-specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint. Appetite. 2014; 85:91-103. PMC: 4286116. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.11.006. View

4.
Hofmann W, Friese M, Strack F . Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 4(2):162-76. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x. View

5.
Neimeijer R, de Jong P, Roefs A . Temporal attention for visual food stimuli in restrained eaters. Appetite. 2013; 64:5-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.12.013. View