» Articles » PMID: 28594908

Distribution and Drivers of Global Mangrove Forest Change, 1996-2010

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Jun 9
PMID 28594908
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For the period 1996-2010, we provide the first indication of the drivers behind mangrove land cover and land use change across the (pan-)tropics using time-series Japanese Earth Resources Satellite (JERS-1) Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) Phased Array-type L-band SAR (PALSAR) data. Multi-temporal radar mosaics were manually interpreted for evidence of loss and gain in forest extent and its associated driver. Mangrove loss as a consequence of human activities was observed across their entire range. Between 1996-2010 12% of the 1168 1°x1° radar mosaic tiles examined contained evidence of mangrove loss, as a consequence of anthropogenic degradation, with this increasing to 38% when combined with evidence of anthropogenic activity prior to 1996. The greatest proportion of loss was observed in Southeast Asia, whereby approximately 50% of the tiles in the region contained evidence of mangrove loss, corresponding to 18.4% of the global mangrove forest tiles. Southeast Asia contained the greatest proportion (33.8%) of global mangrove forest. The primary driver of anthropogenic mangrove loss was found to be the conversion of mangrove to aquaculture/agriculture, although substantial advance of mangroves was also evident in many regions.

Citing Articles

Endophytic Streptomyces: an underexplored source with potential for novel natural drug discovery and development.

Sivalingam P, Easwaran M, Ganapathy D, Basha S, Pote J Arch Microbiol. 2024; 206(11):442.

PMID: 39436470 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-024-04169-z.


Mangrove Species Classification from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Images Using Object-Oriented Methods Based on Feature Combination and Optimization.

Ye F, Zhou B Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(13).

PMID: 39000887 PMC: 11244031. DOI: 10.3390/s24134108.


Four decades of data indicate that planted mangroves stored up to 75% of the carbon stocks found in intact mature stands.

Bourgeois C, MacKenzie R, Sharma S, Bhomia R, Johnson N, Rovai A Sci Adv. 2024; 10(27):eadk5430.

PMID: 38968357 PMC: 11801255. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adk5430.


Environmental, economic, and social sustainability in aquaculture: the aquaculture performance indicators.

Garlock T, Asche F, Anderson J, Eggert H, Anderson T, Che B Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5274.

PMID: 38902254 PMC: 11190207. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49556-8.


Global annual wetland dataset at 30 m with a fine classification system from 2000 to 2022.

Zhang X, Liu L, Zhao T, Wang J, Liu W, Chen X Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):310.

PMID: 38521796 PMC: 10960823. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03143-0.


References
1.
Danielsen F, Sorensen M, Olwig M, Selvam V, Parish F, Burgess N . The Asian tsunami: a protective role for coastal vegetation. Science. 2005; 310(5748):643. DOI: 10.1126/science.1118387. View

2.
Richards D, Friess D . Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000-2012. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 113(2):344-9. PMC: 4720307. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510272113. View

3.
Paez-Osuna F . The environmental impact of shrimp aquaculture: causes, effects, and mitigating alternatives. Environ Manage. 2001; 28(1):131-40. DOI: 10.1007/s002670010212. View

4.
Polidoro B, Carpenter K, Collins L, Duke N, Ellison A, Ellison J . The loss of species: mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of global concern. PLoS One. 2010; 5(4):e10095. PMC: 2851656. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010095. View

5.
Saatchi S, Harris N, Brown S, Lefsky M, Mitchard E, Salas W . Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(24):9899-904. PMC: 3116381. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1019576108. View