» Articles » PMID: 28593056

Management Options for Advanced Low or Intermediate Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review of Recent Literature

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2017 Jun 9
PMID 28593056
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our understanding of the biology, genetics, and natural history of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas has improved considerably in the last several decades and the spectrum of available therapeutic options is rapidly expanding. The management of patients with metastatic low or intermediate grade NETs has been revolutionized by the development of new treatment strategies such as molecular targeting therapies with everolimus and sunitinib, somatostatin analogs, tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitors, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy that can be used alone or as a multimodal approach with or without surgery. To further define and clarify the utility, appropriateness, and the sequence of the growing list of available therapies for this patient population will require more high level evidence; however, data from well-designed randomized phase III clinical trials is rapidly accumulating that will further stimulate development of new management strategies. It is therefore important to thoroughly review emerging evidence and report major findings in frequent updates, which will expand our knowledge and contribute to a better understanding, characterization, and management of advanced NETs.

Citing Articles

What have we learnt from the past - would treatment decisions for GEP-NET patients differ between 2012 to 2016 by the new recommendations in 2022?.

Stiefel R, Lehmann K, Winder T, Siebenhuner A BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):148.

PMID: 36782152 PMC: 9926660. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10567-1.


Cdk5 drives formation of heterogeneous pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Carter A, Kumar N, Herring B, Tan C, Guenter R, Telange R Oncogenesis. 2021; 10(12):83.

PMID: 34862365 PMC: 8642406. DOI: 10.1038/s41389-021-00372-5.


Primary versus secondary nature of mesenteric neuroendocrine tumours.

Park A, Martin A, Carlos R, Neychev V BMJ Case Rep. 2021; 14(2).

PMID: 33541996 PMC: 7868254. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-239217.


Distinct DNA Methylation Signatures in Neuroendocrine Tumors Specific for Primary Site and Inherited Predisposition.

Tirosh A, Killian J, Petersen D, Zhu Y, Walker R, Blau J J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 105(10).

PMID: 32706863 PMC: 7456345. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa477.


Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Advanced Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors (GI NET): A Multicenter Retrospective Chart Review Study.

Kulke M, Benson A, Dasari A, Huynh L, Cai B, Totev T Oncologist. 2019; 24(8):1056-1065.

PMID: 30606883 PMC: 6693731. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0519.

References
1.
Nazario J, Gupta S . Transarterial liver-directed therapies of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases. Semin Oncol. 2010; 37(2):118-26. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.03.004. View

2.
Pavel M, Baudin E, Couvelard A, Krenning E, Oberg K, Steinmuller T . ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary. Neuroendocrinology. 2012; 95(2):157-76. DOI: 10.1159/000335597. View

3.
Yao J, Phan A, Chang D, Wolff R, Hess K, Gupta S . Efficacy of RAD001 (everolimus) and octreotide LAR in advanced low- to intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors: results of a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(26):4311-8. PMC: 2653122. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.7858. View

4.
Johannessen C, Reczek E, James M, Brems H, Legius E, Cichowski K . The NF1 tumor suppressor critically regulates TSC2 and mTOR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(24):8573-8. PMC: 1142482. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0503224102. View

5.
Hallet J, Law C, Cukier M, Saskin R, Liu N, Singh S . Exploring the rising incidence of neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based analysis of epidemiology, metastatic presentation, and outcomes. Cancer. 2014; 121(4):589-97. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29099. View