» Articles » PMID: 28589400

Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Localized or Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: Removing the Primary

Overview
Journal Curr Urol Rep
Publisher Current Science
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Jun 8
PMID 28589400
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: We reviewed the literature to determine what role, if any, radical prostatectomy should play in the treatment of high-risk and/or node-positive prostate cancer.

Recent Findings: The AUA, NCCN, and EAU all include radical prostatectomy as a treatment option for high-risk prostate cancer based on evidence that has shown improvements in biochemical-free and disease-specific survival. Lymph node-positive patients may also derive benefit from radical prostatectomy with lymph node dissection, however, only retrospective studies with high risk of selection bias have been published to date. High-risk prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease representing a wide range of disease characteristics. Radical surgery, historically avoided in such patients, may now be considered a valid treatment option for select cases. The adverse effects of surgery using modern techniques lead to similar quality of life outcomes as radiation therapy, and treatment of the primary tumor is likely beneficial when compared to ADT alone.

Citing Articles

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the clinical factors influencing locally advanced prostate cancer.

Ke Z, Xu Y, Shu Y, Wang C, Wu B, Zhang B Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(2):676-685.

PMID: 38482405 PMC: 10928594. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-1680.


A comparison of the survival outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy in patients over 75 years old with non-metastatic prostate cancer: A Korean multicenter study.

Ko Y, Park S, Ha U, Joung J, Jeong S, Byun S Investig Clin Urol. 2021; 62(5):535-544.

PMID: 34387037 PMC: 8421997. DOI: 10.4111/icu.20210079.


Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins in Patients With Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zhang L, Zhao H, Wu B, Zha Z, Yuan J, Feng Y Front Oncol. 2021; 10:539592.

PMID: 33628724 PMC: 7897672. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.539592.

References
1.
Philip J, Dutta Roy S, Ballal M, Foster C, Javle P . Is a digital rectal examination necessary in the diagnosis and clinical staging of early prostate cancer?. BJU Int. 2005; 95(7):969-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05449.x. View

2.
Jo J, Kook H, Byun S, Lee S, Hong S . Stratification of Contemporary Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 22(6):2088-93. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4183-7. View

3.
Schmeller N, Lubos W . Early endocrine therapy versus radical prostatectomy combined with early endocrine therapy for stage D1 prostate cancer. Br J Urol. 1997; 79(2):226-34. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.33215.x. View

4.
Tzelepi V, Efstathiou E, Wen S, Troncoso P, Karlou M, Pettaway C . Persistent, biologically meaningful prostate cancer after 1 year of androgen ablation and docetaxel treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(18):2574-81. PMC: 3138635. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.2999. View

5.
Mathieu R, Korn S, Bensalah K, Kramer G, Shariat S . Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer: Does it really make sense?. World J Urol. 2016; 35(4):567-577. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1906-3. View