Flexion Posteroanterior Radiographs Affect Both Enrollment for and Outcomes After Injection Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis

Overview

Journal Orthop J Sports Med

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2017 Jun 8

PMID 28589160

Citations 1

Authors

Maximilian A Meyer

Timothy S Leroux

David M Levy

Annemarie K Tilton

Paul B Lewis

Adam B Yanke

Brian J Cole

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Knee injection therapy is less effective for severe osteoarthritis (OA), specifically Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 4. Patient selection for knee injection trials has historically been based on extension anteroposterior (AP) radiographic evaluation; however, emerging evidence suggests that KL grading using a flexion posteroanterior (PA) radiograph more accurately and reproducibly predicts disease severity. The impact of radiographic view on patient selection and outcome after knee injection therapy remains unknown.

Hypothesis: A 45° flexion PA radiograph will reveal more advanced knee OA in certain patients. These patients will report worse pre- and postinjection outcomes.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Four raters independently graded extension AP and flexion PA radiographs from 91 patients previously enrolled in a knee injection trial. Patients determined to have KL grade 4 OA by any rater on extension AP radiographs were excluded. Among included patients, those upgraded to KL grade 4 on flexion PA radiographs by at least 2 raters constituted group 2, while all remaining patients constituted group 1. Demographic data and patient-reported outcome scores before injection and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postinjection were compared between groups.

Results: Overall, 64 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 19 patients (30%) constituted group 2. Compared with group 1, patients in group 2 were older (58.7 vs 52.3 years, = .02), had worse visual analog scale pain scores before (6.6 vs 5.3, = .03) and 6 months after injection (5.3 vs 3.5, = .01), had less improvement in both Lysholm (8.5 vs 20.5, = .02) and Short Form-12 physical component (-2.2 vs 1.7, = .03) scores from preinjection to 6 months postinjection, and had less improvement in both Lysholm (1.6 vs 13.1, = .03) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score sport subscale (-2.1 vs 16, = .01) scores from preinjection to 12 months postinjection.

Conclusion: One in 3 patients considered to have mild to moderate knee OA on extension AP radiography is upgraded to severe knee OA (KL grade 4) on flexion PA radiography. These patients report worse preinjection outcomes, worse pain scores at short-term follow-up, and decreased improvement in knee function scores between 6 months and 1 year postinjection.

Citing Articles

Early knee OA definition-what do we know at this stage? An imaging perspective.

Li X, Roemer F, Cicuttini F, MacKay J, Turmezei T, Link T Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2023; 15:1759720X231158204.

PMID: 36937824 PMC: 10017942. DOI: 10.1177/1759720X231158204.

References

Campbell K, Saltzman B, Mascarenhas R, Khair M, Verma N, Bach Jr B . Does Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection Provide Clinically Superior Outcomes Compared With Other Therapies in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses. Arthroscopy. 2015; 31(11):2213-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.041. View

Messieh S, Fowler P, Munro T . Anteroposterior radiographs of the osteoarthritic knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72(4):639-40. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2380220. View

Chevalier X, Jerosch J, Goupille P, van Dijk N, Luyten F, Scott D . Single, intra-articular treatment with 6 ml hylan G-F 20 in patients with symptomatic primary osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 69(1):113-9. PMC: 2789938. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.094623. View

Parmigiani L, Furtado R, Lopes R, Ribeiro L, Natour J . Joint lavage associated with triamcinolone hexacetonide injection in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized double-blind controlled study. Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 29(11):1311-5. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-010-1529-9. View

Felson D, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan R . The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1987; 30(8):914-8. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780300811. View

Raeissadat S, Rayegani S, Hassanabadi H, Fathi M, Ghorbani E, Babaee M . Knee Osteoarthritis Injection Choices: Platelet- Rich Plasma (PRP) Versus Hyaluronic Acid (A one-year randomized clinical trial). Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 8:1-8. PMC: 4287055. DOI: 10.4137/CMAMD.S17894. View

Jevsevar D . Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edition. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013; 21(9):571-6. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-09-571. View

Dervin G, Feibel R, Rody K, Grabowski J . 3-Foot standing AP versus 45 degrees PA radiograph for osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin J Sport Med. 2001; 11(1):10-6. DOI: 10.1097/00042752-200101000-00003. View

Wright R . Osteoarthritis Classification Scales: Interobserver Reliability and Arthroscopic Correlation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(14):1145-1151. PMC: 4083772. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00929. View

10.

Piperno M, Le Graverand M, Conrozier T, BOCHU M, Mathieu P, Vignon E . Quantitative evaluation of joint space width in femorotibial osteoarthritis: comparison of three radiographic views. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999; 6(4):252-9. DOI: 10.1053/joca.1998.0118. View

11.

Pires E Albuquerque R, Carvalho A, Giordano V, Djahjah M, do Amaral N . [Comparative study between different radiographic plans in knee osteoarthritis]. Acta Reumatol Port. 2009; 34(2B):380-7. View

12.

Nagashima H, Suzuki M, Araki S, Yamabe T, Muto C . Preliminary assessment of the safety and efficacy of tanezumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19(12):1405-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.09.006. View

13.

DeCaria J, Montero-Odasso M, Wolfe D, Chesworth B, Petrella R . The effect of intra-articular hyaluronic acid treatment on gait velocity in older knee osteoarthritis patients: a randomized, controlled study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011; 55(2):310-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.11.007. View

14.

Kon E, Filardo G, Drobnic M, Madry H, Jelic M, Van Dijk N . Non-surgical management of early knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 20(3):436-49. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1713-8. View

15.

Danielsson L, HERNBORG J . Clinical and roentgenologic study of knee joints with osteophytes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970; 69:302-12. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197003000-00035. View

16.

van der Weegen W, Wullems J, Bos E, Noten H, van Drumpt R . No difference between intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid and placebo for mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 30(5):754-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.012. View

17.

Kijowski R, Blankenbaker D, Stanton P, Fine J, De Smet A . Radiographic findings of osteoarthritis versus arthroscopic findings of articular cartilage degeneration in the tibiofemoral joint. Radiology. 2006; 239(3):818-24. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2393050584. View

18.

Katz N, Paillard F, Ekman E . Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10:24. PMC: 4327973. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-014-0144-x. View

19.

Navarro-Sarabia F, Coronel P, Collantes E, Navarro F, de la Serna A, Naranjo A . A 40-month multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and carry-over effect of repeated intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid in knee osteoarthritis: the AMELIA project. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011; 70(11):1957-62. PMC: 3184238. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2011.152017. View

20.

Kijowski R, Blankenbaker D, Stanton P, Fine J, De Smet A . Arthroscopic validation of radiographic grading scales of osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(3):794-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1123. View