» Articles » PMID: 28588523

Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Jun 8
PMID 28588523
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Structural equation models (SEMs) can be estimated using a variety of methods. For complete normally distributed data, two asymptotically efficient estimation methods exist: maximum likelihood (ML) and generalized least squares (GLS). With incomplete normally distributed data, an extension of ML called "full information" ML (FIML), is often the estimation method of choice. An extension of GLS to incomplete normally distributed data has never been developed or studied. In this article we define the "full information" GLS estimator for incomplete normally distributed data (FIGLS). We also identify and study an important application of the new GLS approach. In many modeling contexts, the variables in the SEM are linear composites (e.g., sums or averages) of the raw items. For instance, SEMs often use parcels (sums of raw items) as indicators of latent factors. If data are missing at the item level, but the model is at the composite level, FIML is not possible. In this situation, FIGLS may be the only asymptotically efficient estimator available. Results of a simulation study comparing the new FIGLS estimator to the best available analytic alternative, two-stage ML, with item-level missing data are presented.

References
1.
Collins L, Schafer J, Kam C . A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychol Methods. 2002; 6(4):330-51. View

2.
Schafer J, Graham J . Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002; 7(2):147-77. View

3.
Allison P . Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003; 112(4):545-57. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.545. View

4.
Savalei V . Expected versus observed information in SEM with incomplete normal and nonnormal data. Psychol Methods. 2010; 15(4):352-67. DOI: 10.1037/a0020143. View

5.
Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard P, Savalei V . When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods. 2012; 17(3):354-73. DOI: 10.1037/a0029315. View