» Articles » PMID: 28582250

A Personalized Self-Management Rehabilitation System with an Intelligent Shoe for Stroke Survivors: A Realist Evaluation

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2017 Jun 6
PMID 28582250
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In the United Kingdom, stroke is the most significant cause of adult disability. Stroke survivors are frequently left with physical and psychological changes that can profoundly affect their functional ability, independence, and social participation. Research suggests that long-term, intense, task- and context-specific rehabilitation that is goal-oriented and environmentally enriched improves function, independence, and quality of life after a stroke. It is recommended that rehabilitation should continue until maximum recovery has been achieved. However, the increasing demand on services and financial constraints means that needs cannot be met through traditional face-to-face delivery of rehabilitation. Using a participatory design methodology, we developed an information communication technology-enhanced Personalized Self-Managed rehabilitation System (PSMrS) for stroke survivors with integrated insole sensor technology within an "intelligent shoe.". The intervention model was based around a rehabilitation paradigm underpinned by theories of motor relearning and neuroplastic adaptation, motivational feedback, self-efficacy, and knowledge transfer.

Objective: To understand the conditions under which this technology-based rehabilitation solution would most likely have an impact on the motor behavior of the user, what would work for whom, in what context, and how. We were interested in what aspects of the system would work best to facilitate the motor behavior change associated with self-managed rehabilitation and which user characteristics and circumstances of use could promote improved functional outcomes.

Methods: We used a Realist Evaluation (RE) framework to evaluate the final prototype PSMrS with the assumption that the intervention consists of a series of configurations that include the Context of use, the underlying Mechanisms of change and the potential Outcomes or impacts (CMOs). We developed the CMOs from literature reviews and engagement with clinicians, users, and caregivers during a series of focus groups and home visits. These CMOs were then tested in five in-depth case studies with stroke survivors and their caregivers.

Results: While two new propositions emerged, the second importantly related to the self-management aspects of the system. The study revealed that the system should also encourage independent use and the setting of personalized goals or activities.

Conclusions: Information communication technology that purports to support the self-management of stroke rehabilitation should give significant consideration to the need for motivational feedback that provides quantitative, reliable, accurate, context-specific, and culturally sensitive information about the achievement of personalized goal-based activities.

Citing Articles

A Personalized Multimodal BCI-Soft Robotics System for Rehabilitating Upper Limb Function in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Premchand B, Zhang Z, Ang K, Yu J, Tan I, Lam J Biomimetics (Basel). 2025; 10(2).

PMID: 39997117 PMC: 11852476. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics10020094.


Understanding the Sociocultural Challenges and Opportunities for Affordable Wearables to Support Poststroke Upper-Limb Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study.

Rony R, Amir S, Ahmed N, Atiba S, Verdezoto N, Sparkes V JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024; 11:e54699.

PMID: 38807327 PMC: 11150729. DOI: 10.2196/54699.


Behavior Change Approaches in Digital Technology-Based Physical Rehabilitation Interventions Following Stroke: Scoping Review.

Gooch H, Jarvis K, Stockley R J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e48725.

PMID: 38656777 PMC: 11079774. DOI: 10.2196/48725.


Factors that influence the provision of home-based rehabilitation services for people needing rehabilitation: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Velez M, Lugo-Agudelo L, Patino Lugo D, Glenton C, Posada A, Mesa Franco L Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 2:CD014823.

PMID: 36780267 PMC: 9918343. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014823.


Toward the Value Sensitive Design of eHealth Technologies to Support Self-management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Content Analysis.

Cruz-Martinez R, Wentzel J, Bente B, Sanderman R, van Gemert-Pijnen J JMIR Cardio. 2021; 5(2):e31985.

PMID: 34855608 PMC: 8686487. DOI: 10.2196/31985.


References
1.
Parker J, Mawson S, Mountain G, Nasr N, Zheng H . Stroke patients' utilisation of extrinsic feedback from computer-based technology in the home: a multiple case study realistic evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014; 14:46. PMC: 4070341. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-46. View

2.
Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Noreau L, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Bourget A . Long-term changes in participation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006; 13(4):86-96. DOI: 10.1310/tsr1304-86. View

3.
Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G . Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011; 377(9778):1693-702. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5. View

4.
Ones K, Yilmaz E, Cetinkaya B, Caglar N . Quality of life for patients poststroke and the factors affecting it. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007; 14(6):261-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2005.07.003. View

5.
Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Bravo G, St-Cyr-Tribble D, Bourget A . Changes in participation after a mild stroke: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007; 14(3):59-68. DOI: 10.1310/tsr1403-59. View