Freeze-only Versus Fresh Embryo Transfer in a Multicenter Matched Cohort Study: Contribution of Progesterone and Maternal Age to Success Rates
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To compare implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates in freeze-only versus fresh transfer cycles.
Design: Retrospective matched cohort study.
Setting: Not applicable.
Patient(s): Women selected using a matching algorithm for similar distributions of clinical characteristics for a total of 2,910 cycles (1,455 fresh cohort and 1,455 freeze-only cohort).
Intervention(s): None.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates.
Result(s): Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates were statistically significantly higher in the freeze-only transfer cohort than in the matched fresh transfer cohort: ongoing pregnancy rate for freeze-only was 52.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.4-54.6) and for fresh was 45.3% (95% CI, 42.7-47.9), odds ratio (OR) 1.31 (95% CI, 1.13-1.51). In a stratified analysis, the odds of ongoing pregnancy after freeze-only transfer were statistically significantly higher for women both above and below age 35 with progesterone concentration >1.0 ng/mL (age ≤35: OR 1.38 [1.11-1.71]; age >35: OR 1.73 [1.34-2.24]). For women with progesterone concentration ≤1.0 ng/mL, no statistically significant difference in freeze-only odds of ongoing pregnancy was observed in either age group. The sensitivity analysis revealed that increasing maternal age alone (regardless of progesterone) trended toward a more beneficial effect of freeze-only cycles. A lower progesterone concentration was associated with statistically significantly higher ongoing pregnancy odds for fresh but not freeze-only cycles.
Conclusion(s): Freeze-only transfer protocols are associated with statistically significantly higher ongoing implantation and pregnancy rates compared with fresh transfer cycles. This effect is most pronounced for cycles with progesterone >1.0 ng/mL at trigger and may also be stronger for older patients.
Todorov P, Hristova E, Petrova N, Milachich T F S Rep. 2024; 5(2):145-151.
PMID: 38983741 PMC: 11228792. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.01.003.
Vitrification of human blastocysts for couples undergoing assisted reproduction: an updated review.
Sciorio R, Tramontano L, Campos G, Greco P, Mondrone G, Surbone A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1398049.
PMID: 38827525 PMC: 11140474. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1398049.
Lersten I, Grau L, Jahandideh S, Devine K, Zalles L, Plosker S J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(4):893-902.
PMID: 38600428 PMC: 11052734. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03062-4.
Hunt S, Liu J, Luo P, Zhong Y, Mol B, Chi L J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(6):1549-1555.
PMID: 38568463 PMC: 11224202. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03103-y.
Comparison of maternal complications between fresh and frozen embryo transfer during gestation.
Hosseinimousa S, Ziaee M, Zeraati H, Ghasemi S Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 20(4):264-268.
PMID: 38073077 PMC: 10711529. DOI: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2023.02043.