» Articles » PMID: 28575003

Establishment and Transfer of Classical Eyeblink Conditioning Using Electrical Microstimulation of the Hippocampus As the Conditioned Stimulus

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Jun 3
PMID 28575003
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present experiment was designed to determine whether classical eyeblink conditioning (EBC) can be established by using electrical microstimulation of the hippocampus as a conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with an air-puff unconditioned stimulus (US). We intended to examine whether EBC transfer could occur when a CS was shifted between microstimulation of the hippocampus as a CS (Hip-CS) and tone as a CS (tone-CS) and to compare the difference in transfer effectiveness between delay EBC (dEBC) and trace EBC (tEBC). Eight groups of guinea pigs, including 4 experimental groups and 4 control groups, were included in the study. First, the experimental groups received either a Hip-CS or a tone-CS paired with a US; then, these groups were exposed to a shifted CS (tone-CS or Hip-CS) paired with the US. The control groups received the corresponding Hip-CS or tone-CS, which was, however, pseudo-paired with the US. The control groups were then shifted to the tone-CS (or Hip-CS) paired with the US. The results show that EBC can be successfully established when using microstimulation of the hippocampus as a CS paired with an air-puff US, and that the acquisition rates of EBC are higher in the experimental groups than in the control groups after switching from the Hip-CS to the tone-CS or vice versa, indicating the occurrence of learning transfer between EBC established with the Hip-CS and tone-CS. The present study also demonstrated that the EBC re-acquisition rates were remarkably higher in dEBC than in tEBC with both types of transfer, which suggests that the saving effect was more evident in dEBC than tEBC. These results significantly expand our knowledge of EBC transfer as well as the functional neural circuit underlying EBC transfer.

References
1.
Freeman J, Halverson H, Hubbard E . Inferior colliculus lesions impair eyeblink conditioning in rats. Learn Mem. 2007; 14(12):842-6. PMC: 2151021. DOI: 10.1101/lm.716107. View

2.
Christian K, Thompson R . Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention. Learn Mem. 2003; 10(6):427-55. DOI: 10.1101/lm.59603. View

3.
Hu B, Chen H, Yang L, Tao Z, Yan J, Zhang Y . Changes of synaptic ultrastructure in the guinea pig interpositus nuclei associate with response magnitude and timing after trace eyeblink conditioning. Behav Brain Res. 2011; 226(2):529-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.10.011. View

4.
Squire L, Zola S . Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93(24):13515-22. PMC: 33639. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13515. View

5.
Moyer Jr J, Deyo R, Disterhoft J . Hippocampectomy disrupts trace eye-blink conditioning in rabbits. Behav Neurosci. 1990; 104(2):243-52. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.104.2.243. View