» Articles » PMID: 28573308

Serial Practice Impairs Motor Skill Consolidation

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Jun 3
PMID 28573308
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent reports have revealed that motor skill learning is impaired if two skills are practiced one after the other, that is before the first skill has had the time to become consolidated. This suggests that motor skills should be practiced in isolation from one another to minimize interference. At the moment, little is known about the effect of practice schedules high in contextual interference on motor skill consolidation. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether a serial practice schedule impairs motor skill consolidation. Participants had to learn two distinct sequences of finger movements (A and B) under either a blocked practice schedule or a serial practice schedule before being retested the following day. A control group also practiced Sequence A only. Our results revealed that a blocked practice schedule led to no interference between the sequences, whereas a serial practice schedule impaired the consolidation of Sequence B. In Experiment 2, we investigated the origin of the interference caused by a serial practice schedule by replacing the physical practice of Sequence A with either the observation of a model performing Sequence A or by asking participants to produce random finger movements. Our results revealed that both tasks interfered with the consolidation of Sequence B. Thus, we suggest that a serial practice schedule impairs motor skill consolidation through a conflict in the brain networks involved in the acquisition of the cognitive representation of the sequence and its execution.

Citing Articles

Time of day and sleep effects on motor acquisition and consolidation.

Truong C, Ruffino C, Gaveau J, White O, Hilt P, Papaxanthis C NPJ Sci Learn. 2023; 8(1):30.

PMID: 37658041 PMC: 10474136. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-023-00176-9.


A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms.

Ranganathan R, Tomlinson A, Lokesh R, Lin T, Patel P Exp Brain Res. 2020; 239(1):1-19.

PMID: 33170341 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05908-6.

References
1.
Balas M, Netser S, Giladi N, Karni A . Interference to consolidation phase gains in learning a novel movement sequence by handwriting: dependence on laterality and the level of experience with the written sequence. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 180(2):237-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0851-1. View

2.
Krakauer J, Ghilardi M, Ghez C . Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(11):1026-31. DOI: 10.1038/14826. View

3.
Krakauer J, Ghez C, Ghilardi M . Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(2):473-8. PMC: 6725486. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4218-04.2005. View

4.
Hinder M, Walk L, Woolley D, Riek S, Carson R . The interference effects of non-rotated versus counter-rotated trials in visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 180(4):629-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0888-1. View

5.
McGaugh J . Memory--a century of consolidation. Science. 2000; 287(5451):248-51. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5451.248. View