» Articles » PMID: 28570726

Cost-effectiveness of Early Division of the Forehead Flap Pedicle

Overview
Date 2017 Jun 2
PMID 28570726
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: The paramedian forehead flap is considered the gold standard procedure to optimally reconstruct major defects of the nose, but this procedure generally requires 2 stages, where the flap pedicle is divided 3 weeks following the initial surgery to ensure adequate revascularization of the flap from the surrounding recipient tissue bed, which can cost a patient time out of work or away from normal social habits. It has previously been shown that the pedicle may be safely divided after 2 weeks in select patients where revascularization from the recipient bed was confirmed using intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography to potentially save the patient time and money.

Objective: To demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of takedown of the paramedian forehead flap pedicle after 2 weeks using angiography with indocyanine green (ICG).

Design, Setting, And Participants: Retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent 2-week division of the forehead flap after nasal reconstruction. Patient, tumor, defect, and outcomes data were collected. Cost-minimization analysis was performed by comparing the overall costs of 2-week takedown with angiography to a hypothetical patient undergoing 3-week takedown without angiography.

Intervention: Two-week division of the forehead flap after nasal reconstruction.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Cost-minimization analysis performed by calculating the total variable costs for a patient in our cohort vs costs to a theoretical patient for whom angiography was not performed and the pedicle was divided at the 3-week mark.

Results: A total of 22 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 70.3 [10.0] years; 8 women [36.4%] and 14 men [63.6%]). The selection criteria for 2-week division of the pedicle are a wound bed with at least 50% vascularized tissue present, partial-thickness defects, and absence of nicotine use. All were divided at the 2-week mark with no instances of flap necrosis. One patient had a squamous eccrine carcinoma histology before reconstruction, all other patients had basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Cost-minimization analysis showed that the use of angiography with ICG results in cost savings of $177 per patient on average.

Conclusions And Relevance: Two-week takedown of select paramedian forehead flap patients can be performed safely with verification using angiography with ICG. Although this technology inherently adds cost, it is cost-effective, saving a total of $177 per patient.

Level Of Evidence: NA.

Citing Articles

The effect of human recombinant epidermal growth factor on neovascularization and pedicle division time in a rat interpolation flap model.

Parspanci A, Kececi Y, Temiz P Turk J Med Sci. 2024; 54(2):471-482.

PMID: 39050389 PMC: 11265903. DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5812.


The Autonomization Principle in Vascularized Flaps: An Alternative Strategy for Composite Tissue Scaffold In Vivo Revascularization.

Berkane Y, Kostyra D, Chrelias T, Randolph M, Lellouch A, Cetrulo Jr C Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(12).

PMID: 38136031 PMC: 10740989. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10121440.


Single-stage acellular dermal matrix reconstruction of defects in the nose and ears with exposed cartilage: a prospective case series.

Lei Y, Huang S BMC Surg. 2022; 22(1):444.

PMID: 36577989 PMC: 9795770. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01859-7.


The Use of Infrared Thermography in Determining Timing for Early Pedicle Division of the Preexpanded Bipedicled Visor Flap after Ischemic Preconditioning.

Xiao W, Zhang S, Li H, Feng S, Nicoli F, Huynh R Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022; 2022:8564922.

PMID: 35928575 PMC: 9345714. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8564922.


Application of FACE-Q and NOSE in Nasal Reconstruction with Paramedian Frontal Flap after Skin Cancer Resection.

Pagotto V, Tutihashi R, Ribeiro R, Takahashi G, Camargo C, Busnardo F Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9(4):e3533.

PMID: 33854868 PMC: 8032362. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003533.


References
1.
Correa B, Weathers W, Wolfswinkel E, Thornton J . The forehead flap: the gold standard of nasal soft tissue reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2014; 27(2):96-103. PMC: 3743909. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1351231. View

2.
Rogers H, Weinstock M, Feldman S, Coldiron B . Incidence Estimate of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer (Keratinocyte Carcinomas) in the U.S. Population, 2012. JAMA Dermatol. 2015; 151(10):1081-6. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1187. View

3.
Cakir B, Adamson P, Cingi C . Epidemiology and economic burden of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2012; 20(4):419-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2012.07.004. View

4.
Menick F . A 10-year experience in nasal reconstruction with the three-stage forehead flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109(6):1839-55; discussion 1856-61. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200205000-00010. View

5.
Ishihara H, Otomo N, Suzuki A, Takamura K, Tsubo T, Matsuki A . Detection of capillary protein leakage by glucose and indocyanine green dilutions during the early post-burn period. Burns. 1998; 24(6):525-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0305-4179(98)80004-1. View