» Articles » PMID: 28552399

Evaluation of Lactate, White Blood Cell Count, Neutrophil Count, Procalcitonin and Immature Granulocyte Count As Biomarkers for Sepsis in Emergency Department Patients

Overview
Journal Clin Biochem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2017 May 30
PMID 28552399
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lactate, white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil count, procalcitonin and immature granulocyte (IG) count were compared for the prediction of sepsis, and severe sepsis or septic shock, in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 501 ED patients with a sepsis panel ordered for suspicion of sepsis. WBC, neutrophil, and IG counts were measured on a Sysmex XT-2000i analyzer. Lactate was measured by i-STAT, and procalcitonin by Brahms Kryptor. We classified patients as having sepsis using a simplification of the 1992 consensus conference sepsis definitions. Patients with sepsis were further classified as having severe sepsis or septic shock using established criteria. Univariate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine odds ratio (OR), area under the ROC curve (AUC), and sensitivity/specificity at optimal cut-off for prediction of sepsis (vs. no sepsis), and prediction of severe sepsis or septic shock (vs. no sepsis).

Results: There were 267 patients without sepsis; and 234 with sepsis, including 35 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Lactate had the highest OR (1.44, 95th% CI 1.20-1.73) for the prediction of sepsis; while WBC, neutrophil count and percent (neutrophil/WBC) had OR>1.00 (p<0.05). All biomarkers had AUC<0.70 and sensitivity and specificity <70% at the optimal cut-off. Initial lactate was the best biomarker for predicting severe sepsis or septic shock, with an odds ratio (95th% CI) of 2.70 (2.02-3.61) and AUC 0.89 (0.82-0.96).

Conclusion: Traditional biomarkers (lactate, WBC, neutrophil count, procalcitonin, IG) have limited utility in the prediction of sepsis.

Citing Articles

A Screening Tool to Predict Sepsis in Patients With Suspected Infection in the Emergency Department.

Oi Y, Ogawa F, Honzawa H, Abe T, Imaki S, Takeuchi I Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e78728.

PMID: 39926631 PMC: 11806647. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78728.


Old and New Biomarkers in Idiopathic Recurrent Acute Pericarditis (IRAP): Prognosis and Outcomes.

Mascolo R, Bizzi E, Martelli M, Facoetti C, Colazzo G, Barone F Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025; 27(1):17.

PMID: 39798014 PMC: 11724782. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-024-02170-y.


Comparison of Band Percentage vs Immature Granulocyte Percentage in the Setting of Possible Infection Principle Investigators.

Hershberger D, Samson K, Saeed M Adv Hematol. 2025; 2024:3616532.

PMID: 39764354 PMC: 11703591. DOI: 10.1155/ah/3616532.


Risk Factors and Diagnostic Model Construction of Chronic Pain with Cognitive Impairment.

Zhang C, Su Y, Zeng X, Zhu X, Gao R, Liu W J Pain Res. 2024; 17:4331-4342.

PMID: 39712461 PMC: 11662672. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S485000.


CISepsis: a causal inference framework for early sepsis detection.

Li Q, Li D, Jiao H, Wu Z, Nie W Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1488130.

PMID: 39679198 PMC: 11638194. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1488130.