» Articles » PMID: 28546743

Common Methods of Biological Age Estimation

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2017 May 27
PMID 28546743
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

At present, no single indicator could be used as a golden index to estimate aging process. The biological age (BA), which combines several important biomarkers with mathematical modeling, has been proposed for >50 years as an aging estimation method to replace chronological age (CA). The common methods used for BA estimation include the multiple linear regression (MLR), the principal component analysis (PCA), the Hochschild's method, and the Klemera and Doubal's method (KDM). The fundamental differences in these four methods are the roles of CA and the selection criteria of aging biomarkers. In MLR and PCA, CA is treated as the selection criterion and an independent index. The Hochschild's method and KDM share a similar concept, making CA an independent variable. Previous studies have either simply constructed the BA model by one or compared the four methods together. However, reviews have yet to illustrate and compare the four methods systematically. Since the BA model is a potential estimation of aging for clinical use, such as predicting onset and prognosis of diseases, improving the elderly's living qualities, and realizing successful aging, here we summarize previous BA studies, illustrate the basic statistical steps, and thoroughly discuss the comparisons among the four common BA estimation methods.

Citing Articles

Cellular Senescence in Glial Cells: Implications for Multiple Sclerosis.

Maupin E, Adams K J Neurochem. 2025; 169(1):e16301.

PMID: 39831743 PMC: 11745082. DOI: 10.1111/jnc.16301.


Sex and education differences in trajectories of physiological ageing: longitudinal analysis of a prospective English cohort study.

Bloomberg M, Steptoe A medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39830243 PMC: 11741463. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.06.25320036.


New insights into methods to measure biological age: a literature review.

Mathur A, Taurin S, Alshammary S Front Aging. 2025; 5:1395649.

PMID: 39743988 PMC: 11688636. DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2024.1395649.


AcidAGE: a biological age determination neural network based on urine organic acids.

Kobelyatskaya A, Isaev F, Kudryavtseva A, Guvatova Z, Moskalev A Biogerontology. 2024; 26(1):20.

PMID: 39643761 DOI: 10.1007/s10522-024-10161-3.


Insights to aging prediction with AI based epigenetic clocks.

Levy J, Diallo A, Saldias Montivero M, Gabbita S, Salas L, Christensen B Epigenomics. 2024; 17(1):49-57.

PMID: 39584810 PMC: 11703013. DOI: 10.1080/17501911.2024.2432854.


References
1.
Borkan G, Norris A . Assessment of biological age using a profile of physical parameters. J Gerontol. 1980; 35(2):177-84. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/35.2.177. View

2.
Rippon I, Kneale D, de Oliveira C, Demakakos P, Steptoe A . Perceived age discrimination in older adults. Age Ageing. 2013; 43(3):379-86. PMC: 4081784. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/aft146. View

3.
Fontana L, Partridge L, Longo V . Extending healthy life span--from yeast to humans. Science. 2010; 328(5976):321-6. PMC: 3607354. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172539. View

4.
Huffman D . Exercise as a calorie restriction mimetic: implications for improving healthy aging and longevity. Interdiscip Top Gerontol. 2010; 37:157-74. DOI: 10.1159/000320000. View

5.
Belsky D, Caspi A, Houts R, Cohen H, Corcoran D, Danese A . Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(30):E4104-10. PMC: 4522793. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1506264112. View