» Articles » PMID: 28542892

Knowledge, Diagnosis and Management of Dentine Hypersensitivity: a National Survey of Dentists in Nigeria

Overview
Journal Int Dent J
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 May 26
PMID 28542892
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To assess the knowledge of Nigerian dentists regarding dentine hypersensitivity (DH) and their methods of diagnosis and management.

Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of dentists practicing in all six geopolitical zones of Nigeria was conducted. The questionnaire focussed on participant's demography, exposure to patients with DH, knowledge-based questions, diagnosis and management of DH. Data analysis using EPI Info statistical software determined frequencies and proportions. Associations between discrete variables were assessed using the chi-square test (P ≤ 0.05).

Results: A total of 1,057 dentists responded; the majority (83.8%) had practiced for up to 15 years, and 92.0% reported that, on average, between one and 10 of their patients each week complained of DH. The majority (92.8%) of dentists described DH as stimulated brief pain from the tooth; 24.2% expressed that DH can be treated by altering the number of dentinal tubules. A diagnosis of DH is made by tapping (20.6%) or scratching (73.4%) the tooth. Although radical treatments, such as extraction (24.7%) and root canal therapy (34.5%), were mentioned by some, the majority identified aetiological and predisposing factors (98.8%) and provided diet (95.1%) and oral hygiene (95%) counselling as part of the management of DH. Evaluation of 36 knowledge-based questions revealed that only 1.8% of the respondents provided at least 25 correct answers. Knowledge was significantly associated with respondent age and number of years in practice (P ≤ 0.05) but was not associated with the number of patients with DH seen per week (P = 0.46).

Conclusion: Dentists practicing in Nigeria exhibited knowledge gaps concerning DH and its diagnosis and management.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Turkish Dentists' Approach to Over-the-Counter Whitening Agents: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

Basan Tosun M, Yaman B, Celiksoz O, Tepe H Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60602.

PMID: 38894768 PMC: 11185195. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60602.


Assessment of Patients' Experience and Perception Toward Dentinal Hypersensitivity for Its Diagnosis and Management: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Salam T A A, Mubarak Algharbi E, AlSane M, Alhaji M, Ahmed Aldohayan N, Saud Albarrak A Cureus. 2023; 15(2):e35214.

PMID: 36968862 PMC: 10032551. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35214.


A Study of Dentists about Their Knowledge and Practice of Dentine Hypersensitivity.

Izhar F, Nazir M, Majeed A, Almas K Eur J Dent. 2019; 13(4):540-546.

PMID: 31618785 PMC: 6938429. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697110.

References
1.
Cummins D . Dentin hypersensitivity: from diagnosis to a breakthrough therapy for everyday sensitivity relief. J Clin Dent. 2009; 20(1):1-9. View

2.
Leye Benoist F, Ndiaye F, Faye B, Bane K, Ngom P, Ndong P . Knowledge of and management attitude regarding dentin hypersensitivity among dentists from a West African country. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014; 15(1):86-91. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1493. View

3.
Rees J, Addy M . A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29(11):997-1003. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.291104.x. View

4.
Fischer C, Fischer R, Wennberg A . Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentine hypersensitivity in a population in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Dent. 1992; 20(5):272-6. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(92)90043-c. View

5.
Chabanski M, Gillam D, Bulman J, Newman H . Prevalence of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist Periodontology Department. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23(11):989-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00525.x. View