» Articles » PMID: 28536654

Recent Advances in Capsule-based Dry Powder Inhaler Technology

Overview
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2017 May 25
PMID 28536654
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pulmonary drug delivery is currently the focus of accelerated research and development because of the potential to produce maximum therapeutic benefit to patients by directly targeting drug to the site of pathology in the lungs. Among the available delivery options, the dry powder inhaler (DPI) is the preferred device for the treatment of an increasingly diverse range of diseases. However, because drug delivery from a DPI involves a complex interaction between the device and the patient, the engineering development of this medical technology is proving to be a great challenge. Development of DPI systems that target the delivery of fine drug particles to the deeper airways in the lungs using a combination of improved drug formulations and enhanced delivery device technologies means that each of these factors contributes to overall performance of the aerosol system. There are a large range of devices that are currently available, or under development, for clinical use, however no individual device shows superior clinical efficacy. A major concern that is very relevant in day-to-day clinical practice is the inter- and intra-patient variability of the drug dosage delivered to the deep lungs from the inhalation devices, where the extent of variability depends on the drug formulation, the device design, and the patient's inhalation profile. This variability may result in under-dosing of drug to the patient and potential loss of pharmacological efficacy. This article reviews recent advances in capsule-based DPI technology and the introduction of the 'disposable' DPI device.

Citing Articles

Optimization of Carrier-Based Dry Powder Inhaler Performance: A Review.

Mehta T, Najafian S, Patel K, Lacombe J, Chaudhuri B Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(1).

PMID: 39861744 PMC: 11768101. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17010096.


Flowrate Sensing and Measurement in Portable Smart Inhalers.

Mysovskikh I, Legg M, Demidenko S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(21).

PMID: 39517745 PMC: 11548675. DOI: 10.3390/s24216848.


Evaluation of the Importance of Capsule Transparency in Dry Powder Inhalation Devices.

Arija R, de la Espada R, Ollero M, Hernandez L, Gallego E, Lopez-Campos J Ann Fam Med. 2024; 22(5):417-420.

PMID: 39313335 PMC: 11419709. DOI: 10.1370/afm.3147.


Excipients for Novel Inhaled Dosage Forms: An Overview.

Yousry C, Goyal M, Gupta V AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024; 25(2):36.

PMID: 38356031 DOI: 10.1208/s12249-024-02741-w.


Inhalation Dosage Forms: A Focus on Dry Powder Inhalers and Their Advancements.

Magramane S, Vlahovic K, Gordon P, Kallai-Szabo N, Zelko R, Antal I Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(12).

PMID: 38139785 PMC: 10747137. DOI: 10.3390/ph16121658.


References
1.
Crompton G . Problems patients have using pressurized aerosol inhalers. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1982; 119:101-4. View

2.
Adams W, Lee S, Plourde R, Lionberger R, Bertha C, Doub W . Effects of device and formulation on in vitro performance of dry powder inhalers. AAPS J. 2012; 14(3):400-9. PMC: 3385814. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-012-9352-7. View

3.
Zhou Q, Tong Z, Tang P, Citterio M, Yang R, Chan H . Effect of device design on the aerosolization of a carrier-based dry powder inhaler--a case study on Aerolizer(®) Foradile (®). AAPS J. 2013; 15(2):511-22. PMC: 3675743. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-013-9458-6. View

4.
de Koning J, van der Mark T, Coenegracht P, Tromp T, Frijlink H . Effect of an external resistance to airflow on the inspiratory flow curve. Int J Pharm. 2002; 234(1-2):257-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5173(01)00969-3. View

5.
Newman S . A comparison of lung deposition patterns between different asthma inhalers. J Aerosol Med. 1995; 8 Suppl 3:S21-6; discussion S27. DOI: 10.1089/jam.1995.8.suppl_3.s-21. View