Design Challenges of an Episode-Based Payment Model in Oncology: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Oncology Care Model
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services developed the Oncology Care Model as an episode-based payment model to encourage participating practitioners to provide higher-quality, better-coordinated care at a lower cost to the nearly three-quarter million fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with cancer who receive chemotherapy each year. Episode payment models can be complex. They combine into a single benchmark price all payments for services during an episode of illness, many of which may be delivered at different times by different providers in different locations. Policy and technical decisions include the definition of the episode, including its initiation, duration, and included services; the identification of beneficiaries included in the model; and beneficiary attribution to practitioners with overall responsibility for managing their care. In addition, the calculation and risk adjustment of benchmark episode prices for the bundle of services must reflect geographic cost variations and diverse patient populations, including varying disease subtypes, medical comorbidities, changes in standards of care over time, the adoption of expensive new drugs (especially in oncology), as well as diverse practice patterns. Other steps include timely monitoring and intervention as needed to avoid shifting the attribution of beneficiaries on the basis of their expected episode expenditures as well as to ensure the provision of necessary medical services and the development of a meaningful link to quality measurement and improvement through the episode-based payment methodology. The complex and diverse nature of oncology business relationships and the specific rules and requirements of Medicare payment systems for different types of providers intensify these issues. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services believes that by sharing its approach to addressing these decisions and challenges, it may facilitate greater understanding of the model within the oncology community and provide insight to others considering the development of episode-based payment models in the commercial or government sectors.
Race, geography, and risk of breast cancer treatment delays: A population-based study 2004-2015.
Reeder-Hayes K, Jackson B, Baggett C, Kuo T, Gaddy J, LeBlanc M Cancer. 2023; 129(6):925-933.
PMID: 36683417 PMC: 11578059. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34573.
Manz C, Tramontano A, Uno H, Parikh R, Bekelman J, Schrag D JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(9):e2234161.
PMID: 36173630 PMC: 9523492. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34161.
Lefkowitz D Soc Sci Med. 2022; 307:115184.
PMID: 35853317 PMC: 10403999. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115184.
Oncology alternative payment models: lessons from commercial insurance.
Shaughnessy E, Johnson D, Lyss A, Parikh R, Peskin S, Polite B Am J Manag Care. 2022; 28(3):98-100.
PMID: 35404544 PMC: 10193823. DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88835.
Implementation factors for patient navigation program success: a qualitative study.
Pratt-Chapman M, Silber R, Tang J, Le P Implement Sci Commun. 2021; 2(1):141.
PMID: 34930503 PMC: 8685795. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00248-0.