» Articles » PMID: 28534025

Atrial Fibrillation Dynamics and Ionic Block Effects in Six Heterogeneous Human 3D Virtual Atria with Distinct Repolarization Dynamics

Overview
Date 2017 May 24
PMID 28534025
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) usually manifests as reentrant circuits propagating through the whole atria creating chaotic activation patterns. Little is yet known about how differences in electrophysiological and ionic properties between patients modulate reentrant patterns in AF. The goal of this study is to quantify how variability in action potential duration (APD) at different stages of repolarization determines AF dynamics and their modulation by ionic block using a set of virtual whole-atria human models. Six human whole-atria models are constructed based on the same anatomical structure and fiber orientation, but with different electrophysiological phenotypes. Membrane kinetics for each whole-atria model are selected with distinct APD characteristics at 20, 50, and 90% repolarization, from an experimentally calibrated population of human atrial action potential models, including AF remodeling and acetylcholine parasympathetic effects. Our simulations show that in all whole-atria models, reentrant circuits tend to organize around the pulmonary veins and the right atrial appendage, thus leading to higher dominant frequency (DF) and more organized activation in the left atrium than in the right atrium. Differences in APD in all phases of repolarization (not only APD) yielded quantitative differences in fibrillation patterns with long APD associated with slower and more regular dynamics. Long APD and APD were associated with increased interatrial conduction block and interatrial differences in DF and organization index, creating reentry instability and self-termination in some cases. Specific inhibitions of I, I, or I reduce DF and organization of the arrhythmia by enlarging wave meandering, reducing the number of secondary wavelets, and promoting interatrial block in all six virtual patients, especially for the phenotypes with short APD at 20, 50, and/or 90% repolarization. This suggests that therapies aiming at prolonging the early phase of repolarization might constitute effective antiarrhythmic strategies for the pharmacological management of AF. In summary, simulations report significant differences in atrial fibrillatory dynamics resulting from differences in APD at all phases of repolarization.

Citing Articles

Cell-to-cell heterogeneity in ion channel conductance impacts substrate vulnerability to arrhythmia.

Pullinger T, Sobie E Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2024; 327(1):H242-H254.

PMID: 38758124 PMC: 11381019. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00645.2023.


Computational modeling of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis: toward clinical translation.

Trayanova N, Lyon A, Shade J, Heijman J Physiol Rev. 2023; 104(3):1265-1333.

PMID: 38153307 PMC: 11381036. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00017.2023.


Pro-arrhythmic role of adrenergic spatial densities in the human atria: An in-silico study.

Magtibay K, Masse S, Nanthakumar K, Umapathy K PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0290676.

PMID: 37624832 PMC: 10456151. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290676.


What determines the optimal pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation? Insights from in silico trials in 800 virtual atria.

Dasi A, Pope M, Wijesurendra R, Betts T, Sachetto R, Bueno-Orovio A J Physiol. 2023; 601(18):4013-4032.

PMID: 37475475 PMC: 10952228. DOI: 10.1113/JP284730.


drug trials for precision medicine in atrial fibrillation: From ionic mechanisms to electrocardiogram-based predictions in structurally-healthy human atria.

Dasi A, Roy A, Sachetto R, Camps J, Bueno-Orovio A, Rodriguez B Front Physiol. 2022; 13:966046.

PMID: 36187798 PMC: 9522526. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.966046.


References
1.
Harrison J, Sohns C, Linton N, Karim R, Williams S, Rhode K . Repeat left atrial catheter ablation: cardiac magnetic resonance prediction of endocardial voltage and gaps in ablation lesion sets. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015; 8(2):270-8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002066. View

2.
Faes L, Ravelli F . A morphology-based approach to the evaluation of atrial fibrillation organization. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2007; 26(4):59-67. DOI: 10.1109/memb.2007.384097. View

3.
Murgatroyd F, Camm A . Atrial arrhythmias. Lancet. 1993; 341(8856):1317-22. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90824-z. View

4.
Berenfeld O, Jalife J . Complex fractionated atrial electrograms: is this the beast to tame in atrial fibrillation?. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4(4):426-8. PMC: 3244075. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.964841. View

5.
Sivagangabalan G, Nazzari H, Bignolais O, Maguy A, Naud P, Farid T . Regional ion channel gene expression heterogeneity and ventricular fibrillation dynamics in human hearts. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e82179. PMC: 3888386. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082179. View