» Articles » PMID: 28532505

Do Small Changes in Rotation Affect Measurements of Lower Extremity Limb Alignment?

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 May 24
PMID 28532505
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The alignment of the lower extremity has important implications in the development of knee arthritis. The effect of incremental rotations of the limb on common parameters of alignment has not been studied. The purpose of the study was to (1) determine the standardized neutral position measurements of alignment and (2) determine the effect of rotation on commonly used measurements of alignment.

Methods: Eighty-seven full length CT angiography studies (49 males and 38 females, average age 66 years old) were included. Three-dimensional models were created using a rendering software program and placed on a virtual plane. An image of the extremity was obtained. Thirty scans were randomly selected, and those models were rotated in 3° intervals around the longitudinal axis and additional images were obtained.

Results: In the neutral position, the mechanical lateral distal femoral articular angle (mLDFA) was 85.6 ± 2.3°, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) was 86.1 ± 2.8°, and mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA) was -0.7 ± 3.1°. Females had a more valgus alignment with a mTFA of 0.5 ± 2.9° while males had a more varus alignment with a mTFA of -1.7 ± 2.9°. The anatomic tibiofemoral angle (aTFA) was 4.8 ± 2.6°, the anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA) measured 80.2 ± 2.2°, and the anatomical-mechanical angle (AMA) was 5.4 ± 0.7°. The prevalence of constitutional varus was 18%. The effect of rotation on the rotated scans led to statistically significant differences relative to the 0° measurement for all measurements. These effects may be small, and their clinical importance is unknown.

Conclusions: This study provides new information on standardized measures of lower extremity alignment and the relationship between discreet axial rotations of the entire lower extremity and these parameters.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the relationship between the bone alignment of the lower extremity and the importance of Q angle in male athletes.

Gulfirat O, Ekinci M, Kumak A, Tazegul U Sci Prog. 2025; 108(1):368504241304202.

PMID: 39846339 PMC: 11758542. DOI: 10.1177/00368504241304202.


Characteristics of femur morphology and proximal femur bone mineral density in Japanese females with bisphosphonate-related atypical femur fractures.

Yamauchi K, Kato C, Kato T Skeletal Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39710724 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04857-3.


Relevance of instrumented gait analysis in the prediction of the rebound phenomenon after guided growth intervention.

Stief F, Holder J, Braun S, Brenneis M, van Drongelen S, Byrnes S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16060.

PMID: 38992006 PMC: 11239906. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66169-9.


Factors predicting lower limb alignment after Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Shih H, Chen K, Lee C, Tu K, Wang S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5597.

PMID: 38454143 PMC: 10920632. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56285-x.


Towards a better understanding of knee angular deformities: discrepancies between clinical examination and 2D/3D assessments.

Ghanem D, Ghoul A, Assi A, Ghanem I Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 144(3):1005-1011.

PMID: 38070015 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05153-w.


References
1.
Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J . The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 470(1):45-53. PMC: 3237976. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5. View

2.
Terauchi M, Shirakura K, Kobuna Y, Fukasawa N . Axial parameters affecting lower limb alignment after high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (317):141-9. View

3.
Sharma L, Song J, Felson D, Cahue S, Shamiyeh E, Dunlop D . The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. JAMA. 2001; 286(2):188-95. DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.2.188. View

4.
Moreland J, Bassett L, Hanker G . Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69(5):745-9. View

5.
Kettelkamp D, Wenger D, Chao E, Thompson C . Results of proximal tibial osteotomy. The effects of tibiofemoral angle, stance-phase flexion-extension, and medial-plateau force. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976; 58(7):952-60. View