» Articles » PMID: 28532503

An Updated PREDICT Breast Cancer Prognostication and Treatment Benefit Prediction Model with Independent Validation

Abstract

Background: PREDICT is a breast cancer prognostic and treatment benefit model implemented online. The overall fit of the model has been good in multiple independent case series, but PREDICT has been shown to underestimate breast cancer specific mortality in women diagnosed under the age of 40. Another limitation is the use of discrete categories for tumour size and node status resulting in 'step' changes in risk estimates on moving between categories. We have refitted the PREDICT prognostic model using the original cohort of cases from East Anglia with updated survival time in order to take into account age at diagnosis and to smooth out the survival function for tumour size and node status.

Methods: Multivariable Cox regression models were used to fit separate models for ER negative and ER positive disease. Continuous variables were fitted using fractional polynomials and a smoothed baseline hazard was obtained by regressing the baseline cumulative hazard for each patients against time using fractional polynomials. The fit of the prognostic models were then tested in three independent data sets that had also been used to validate the original version of PREDICT.

Results: In the model fitting data, after adjusting for other prognostic variables, there is an increase in risk of breast cancer specific mortality in younger and older patients with ER positive disease, with a substantial increase in risk for women diagnosed before the age of 35. In ER negative disease the risk increases slightly with age. The association between breast cancer specific mortality and both tumour size and number of positive nodes was non-linear with a more marked increase in risk with increasing size and increasing number of nodes in ER positive disease. The overall calibration and discrimination of the new version of PREDICT (v2) was good and comparable to that of the previous version in both model development and validation data sets. However, the calibration of v2 improved over v1 in patients diagnosed under the age of 40.

Conclusions: The PREDICT v2 is an improved prognostication and treatment benefit model compared with v1. The online version should continue to aid clinical decision making in women with early breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Evaluating PREDICT and developing outcome prediction models in early-onset breast cancer using data from Alberta, Canada.

Basmadjian R, Xu Y, Quan M, Lupichuk S, Cheung W, Brenner D Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025; .

PMID: 40072699 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-025-07654-1.


Gene expression profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in lymph node-positive early breast cancer: a systematic review.

Cooper K, Nalbant G, Essat M, Harnan S, Wong R, Hamilton J Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025; .

PMID: 39899163 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07596-0.


Predicting early stage lung cancer recurrence and survival from combined tumor motion amplitude and radiomics on free-breathing 4D-CT.

Ouraou E, Tonneau M, Le W, Filion E, Campeau M, Vu T Med Phys. 2024; 52(3):1926-1940.

PMID: 39704505 PMC: 11880644. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17586.


Priority outcomes of pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer: a patient, carer, and clinician consensus.

Brown K, Morkaya J, Solomon M, Ng K, White K, Sutton P Br J Surg. 2024; 111(12).

PMID: 39656602 PMC: 11631376. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae298.


Expression of transglutaminase-2 (TGM2) in the prognosis of female invasive breast cancer.

Blows F, Ali H, Cope W, Pharoah P, Pike C, Provenzano E BJC Rep. 2024; 2(1):5.

PMID: 39516660 PMC: 11523935. DOI: 10.1038/s44276-023-00030-w.


References
1.
Engelhardt E, van den Broek A, Linn S, Wishart G, Rutgers E, van de Velde A . Accuracy of the online prognostication tools PREDICT and Adjuvant! for early-stage breast cancer patients younger than 50 years. Eur J Cancer. 2017; 78:37-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.015. View

2.
Chen H, Zhou M, Tian W, Meng K, He H . Effect of Age on Breast Cancer Patient Prognoses: A Population-Based Study Using the SEER 18 Database. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0165409. PMC: 5087840. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165409. View

3.
Wishart G, Azzato E, Greenberg D, Rashbass J, Kearins O, Lawrence G . PREDICT: a new UK prognostic model that predicts survival following surgery for invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010; 12(1):R1. PMC: 2880419. DOI: 10.1186/bcr2464. View

4.
Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Pan H, Clarke M . Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011; 379(9814):432-44. PMC: 3273723. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61625-5. View

5.
Maishman T, Copson E, Stanton L, Gerty S, Dicks E, Durcan L . An evaluation of the prognostic model PREDICT using the POSH cohort of women aged ⩽40 years at breast cancer diagnosis. Br J Cancer. 2015; 112(6):983-91. PMC: 4366898. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.57. View