» Articles » PMID: 28523246

Targeted Presurgical Decompensation in Patients with Yaw-dependent Facial Asymmetry

Overview
Journal Korean J Orthod
Date 2017 May 20
PMID 28523246
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Facial asymmetry can be classified into the rolling-dominant type (R-type), translation-dominant type (T-type), yawing-dominant type (Y-type), and atypical type (A-type) based on the distorted skeletal components that cause canting, translation, and yawing of the maxilla and/or mandible. Each facial asymmetry type represents dentoalveolar compensations in three dimensions that correspond to the main skeletal discrepancies. To obtain sufficient surgical correction, it is necessary to analyze the main skeletal discrepancies contributing to the facial asymmetry and then the skeletal-dental relationships in the maxilla and mandible separately. Particularly in cases of facial asymmetry accompanied by mandibular yawing, it is not simple to establish pre-surgical goals of tooth movement since chin deviation and posterior gonial prominence can be either aggravated or compromised according to the direction of mandibular yawing. Thus, strategic dentoalveolar decompensations targeting the real basal skeletal discrepancies should be performed during presurgical orthodontic treatment to allow for sufficient skeletal correction with stability. In this report, we document targeted decompensation of two asymmetry patients focusing on more complicated yaw-dependent types than others: Y-type and A-type. This may suggest a clinical guideline on the targeted decompensation in patient with different types of facial asymmetries.

Citing Articles

Difference in discrepancies of mandibular incisor compensation relative to Menton deviation between Class III roll- and yaw-dominant asymmetries.

Kim H, Noh H, Park H Angle Orthod. 2024; 94(6):631-640.

PMID: 39194995 PMC: 11493426. DOI: 10.2319/022324-141.1.


Soft tissue compensation evaluation in patients with facial asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography combined with 3D facial photographs.

Supmaneenukul Y, Khemla C, Parakonthun K Heliyon. 2024; 10(6):e27720.

PMID: 38496872 PMC: 10944279. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27720.


READER'S FORUM.

Ahn H Korean J Orthod. 2023; 53(6):343-344.

PMID: 37989573 PMC: 10663574. DOI: 10.4041/kjod53.0006RF.


Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular width after mandibular asymmetric setback surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Kim S, Kim S, Kim Y, Park S Korean J Orthod. 2023; 53(2):99-105.

PMID: 36960720 PMC: 10040291. DOI: 10.4041/kjod22.077.


Unilateral condylar hyperplasia treated with simultaneous 2-jaw orthognathic surgery and posterior segmental osteotomy.

Kim S, Jung K, Kim Y, Park S, Kim S Angle Orthod. 2022; .

PMID: 36350296 PMC: 9933568. DOI: 10.2319/060122-401.1.


References
1.
Baek C, Paeng J, Lee J, Hong J . Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 70(5):1161-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.135. View

2.
Hwang H, Hwang C, Lee K, Kang B . Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(6):779-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.021. View

3.
BRUCE R, HAYWARD J . Condylar hyperplasia and mandibular asymmetry: a review. J Oral Surg. 1968; 26(4):281-90. View

4.
Tyan S, Park H, Janchivdorj M, Han S, Kim S, Ahn H . Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod. 2015; 86(3):421-30. PMC: 8601728. DOI: 10.2319/030915-142.1. View

5.
Yang J, Lei J, Wu Y, Lu J, Ke R, Yu Q . Skeleton first in surgical treatment of facial disharmony. J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 26(2):336-9. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001463. View