Orientation and Conformation of Osteocalcin Adsorbed Onto Calcium Phosphate and Silica Surfaces
Overview
Biotechnology
Authors
Affiliations
Adsorption isotherms, circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) were used to investigate the adsorption of human osteocalcin (hOC) and decarboxylated (i.e., Gla converted back to Glu) hOC (dhOC) onto various calcium phosphate surfaces as well as silica surfaces. The adsorption isotherms and XPS nitrogen signals were used to track the amount of adsorbed hOC and dhOC. The intensities of key ToF-SIMS amino acid fragments were used to assess changes in the structure of adsorbed hOC and dhOC. CD spectra were used to investigate the secondary structure of OC. The largest differences were observed when the proteins were adsorbed onto silica versus calcium phosphate surfaces. Similar amounts (3-4 at. % N) of hOC and dhOC were adsorbed onto the silica surface. Higher amounts of hOC and dhOC were adsorbed on all the calcium phosphate surfaces. The ToF-SIMS data showed that the intensity of the Cys amino acid fragment, normalized to intensity of all amino acid fragments, was significantly higher (∼×10) when the proteins were adsorbed onto silica. Since in the native OC structure the cysteines are located in the center of three α-helices, this indicates both hOC and dhOC are more denatured on the silica surface. As hOC and dhOC denature upon adsorption to the silica surface, the cysteines become more exposed and are more readily detected by ToF-SIMS. No significant differences were detected between hOC and dhOC adsorbed onto the silica surface, but small differences were observed between hOC and dhOC adsorbed onto the calcium phosphate surfaces. In the OC structure, the α-3 helix is located above the α-1 and α-2 helices. Small differences in the ToF-SIMS intensities from amino acid fragments characteristic of each helical unit (Asn for α-1; His for α-2; and Phe for α-3) suggests either slight changes in the orientation or a slight uncovering of the α-1 and α-2 for adsorbed dhOC. XPS showed that similar amounts of hOC and dhOC were absorbed onto hydroxyapaptite and octacalcium phosphate surfaces, but ToF-SIMS detected some small differences in the amino acid fragment intensities on these surfaces for adsorbed hOC and dhOC.
Gopinath T, Shin K, Tian Y, Im W, Struppe J, Perrone B J Struct Biol. 2024; 216(1):108061.
PMID: 38185342 PMC: 10939839. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2024.108061.
Alamdari S, Pfaendtner J Mol Syst Des Eng. 2021; 5(3):620-631.
PMID: 33791109 PMC: 8009198. DOI: 10.1039/c9me00158a.
Shin K, Kent J, Singh C, Fujimoto L, Yu J, Tian Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(31):18504-18510.
PMID: 32699145 PMC: 7414086. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2007699117.
Solid-State NMR and MD Study of the Structure of the Statherin Mutant SNa15 on Mineral Surfaces.
Buckle E, Prakash A, Bonomi M, Sampath J, Pfaendtner J, Drobny G J Am Chem Soc. 2019; 141(5):1998-2011.
PMID: 30618247 PMC: 6785181. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b10990.
Roeters S, Tronic E, Baio J, Castner D, Weidner T Biointerphases. 2018; 13(6):06E411.
PMID: 30551688 PMC: 6294649. DOI: 10.1116/1.5056219.