» Articles » PMID: 28515180

Distribution and Extent of Electronic Medical Record Utilisation in Eye Units Across the United Kingdom: a Cross-sectional Study of the Current Landscape

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 May 19
PMID 28515180
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Ophthalmology units across the UK vary widely in their adoption of electronic medical records (EMR). There is a lack of evidence to show the extent and progress of EMR adoption. The aim of this study was to capture a snapshot of the current landscape of EMR use, as a baseline for comparison in future studies.

Setting: An electronic survey questionnaire was sent to all NHS ophthalmology Units in the UK.

Participants: A total of 104 National Health Service (NHS) ophthalmology units participated in the survey, which was carried out over 6 months from December 2013 to June 2014.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Respondents were asked about technology usage pertaining to specific processes in the clinic workflow. This allowed us to determine the extent of EMR usage and details about current use or planned implementation by each unit.

Results: 77.6% (n=104) of NHS ophthalmology units responded. 45.3% (n=48) of units were currently using an EMR and a further 26.4% (n=28) of units plan to implement EMR within 2 years. 70.8% of units with a current EMR system use Medisoft. EMR is used by all clinicians in 37.5% and by all subspecialties offered at the unit in 27.0%. In 56.3%, new clinical notes are entered into EMR only by clinicians. All imaging devices are networked to EMR in 28.3%. In 46.7%, EMR is accessible by other specialties within the same hospital. 71.1% would recommend EMR to a colleague.

Conclusions: EMR has the potential to address current limitations of patient information transfer and sharing in ophthalmology. It is pleasing to see a significant proportion of units already engaging with EMR or having plans to do so in the near future. However, differing EMR systems and lack of remote access mean further optimisation of these record systems are needed to allow data transfer between units.

Citing Articles

Implementing a Common Data Model in Ophthalmology: Mapping Structured Electronic Health Record Ophthalmic Examination Data to Standard Vocabularies.

Quon J, Long C, Halfpenny W, Chuang A, Cai C, Baxter S Ophthalmol Sci. 2025; 5(2):100666.

PMID: 39896425 PMC: 11783105. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100666.


End-to-End Impact of a Cloud-Based Surgical Planning System on Efficiency in Cataract Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study.

Zavodni Z, Pan L, Mok K, Cheng H, OBoyle D Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17:1885-1896.

PMID: 37425026 PMC: 10327899. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S392669.


Comment on: Are electronic medical records a medicolegal risk to the oculoplastic surgeon? A survey of British Oculoplastic Surgery Society Members.

Athwal S, Bhatt P, Haridas A, Jones C Eye (Lond). 2022; 37(11):2360.

PMID: 36477729 PMC: 10366098. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02340-8.


[Employee survey after introduction of the FIDUS electronic patient file at the Saarland University Eye Hospital].

Maamri A, Fries F, Spira-Eppig C, Eppig T, Seitz B Ophthalmologe. 2021; 119(5):471-480.

PMID: 34705089 PMC: 9076743. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-021-01514-1.


Impact of accreditation on documentation and staff perception in the ophthalmology department of an Indian medical college.

Ajay K, Poka A, Narayan M Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021; 69(2):337-342.

PMID: 33463587 PMC: 7933869. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_848_20.


References
1.
Nissman S . Electronic health records. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116(5):1018-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.046. View

2.
Chiang M, Boland M, Brewer A, Epley K, Horton M, Lim M . Special requirements for electronic health record systems in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(8):1681-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.015. View

3.
Wakamiya S, Yamauchi K . Evaluation of electronic medical records for ophthalmology based on changes in staff work through introduction of electronization. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 192:968. View

4.
Kokkonen E, Davis S, Lin H, Dabade T, Feldman S, Fleischer Jr A . Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20(e1):e33-8. PMC: 3715335. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001609. View

5.
Day A, Donachie P, Sparrow J, Johnston R . The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 1, visual outcomes and complications. Eye (Lond). 2015; 29(4):552-60. PMC: 4816350. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2015.3. View