» Articles » PMID: 28505123

Perceived Health Benefits and Willingness to Pay for Parks by Park Users: Quantitative and Qualitative Research

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2017 May 16
PMID 28505123
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Whilst a growing body of evidence demonstrates people derive a range of health and wellbeing benefits from visiting parks, only a limited number of attempts have been made to provide a complementary economic assessment of parks. The aim of this exploratory study was to directly estimate the perceived health and wellbeing benefits attained from parks and the economic value assigned to parks by park users in Victoria, Australia. The research employed a mixed methods approach (survey and interviews) to collect primary data from a selection of 140 park users: 100 from two metropolitan parks in Melbourne and 40 from a park on the urban fringe of Melbourne, Victoria. Our findings suggest that park users derive a range of perceived physical, mental/spiritual, and social health benefits, but park use was predominantly associated with physical health benefits. Overall, our exploratory study findings suggest that park users are willing to pay for parks, as they highly value them as places for exercising, socialising, and relaxing. Importantly, most people would miss parks if they did not exist. The findings aim to provide park managers, public health advocates, and urban policy makers with evidence about the perceived health and wellbeing benefits of park usage and the economic value park visitors place on parks.

Citing Articles

Should Commercial Diagnostic Testing Be Stimulated or Discouraged? Analyzing Willingness-to-Pay and Market Externalities of Three Commercial Diagnostic Tests in The Netherlands.

Stadhouders N, van Vliet E, Brabers A, van Dijk W, Onstwedder S Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023; 22(2):193-207.

PMID: 38099980 PMC: 10864515. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00846-0.


Addressing Inequity: Evaluation of an Intervention to Improve Accessibility and Quality of a Green Space.

Anthun K, Maass R, Hope S, Espnes G, Bell R, Khan M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(24).

PMID: 31835473 PMC: 6950353. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16245015.


A Scoping Review Mapping Research on Green Space and Associated Mental Health Benefits.

Wendelboe-Nelson C, Kelly S, Kennedy M, Cherrie J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(12).

PMID: 31212860 PMC: 6616579. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16122081.


Visitors' Perceived Place Value and the Willingness to Pay in an Urban Lake Park.

Park C, Song H Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(11).

PMID: 30424005 PMC: 6266701. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15112518.


How Urban Parks Offer Opportunities for Physical Activity in Dublin, Ireland.

Burrows E, OMahony M, Geraghty D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(4).

PMID: 29690508 PMC: 5923857. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040815.


References
1.
Veitch J, Carver A, Abbott G, Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Salmon J . How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:610. PMC: 4490648. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6. View

2.
Fan Y, Das K, Chen Q . Neighborhood green, social support, physical activity, and stress: assessing the cumulative impact. Health Place. 2011; 17(6):1202-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.008. View

3.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R . A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24(4):385-96. View

4.
Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S . The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007; 5:63. PMC: 2222612. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63. View

5.
Nielsen T, Hansen K . Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health Place. 2007; 13(4):839-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.001. View