» Articles » PMID: 28504303

Distracted Walking, Bicycling, and Driving: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mobile Technology and Youth Crash Risk

Overview
Journal Child Dev
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2017 May 16
PMID 28504303
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article examined the impact of mobile technology on young pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. A systematic search yielded 41 articles meeting inclusion criteria: peer-reviewed, published before February 1, 2016, behavioral outcome related to pedestrian, bicycling, or driving in the presence of mobile technology use, youth sample. Eleven studies were meta-analyzed to evaluate increased risk for crash/near-crash while distracted. Risk of bias and quality of research were assessed. Across methodologies, developmental stages, and type of distracting task, mobile technology use impairs youth safety on the road. Quality of evidence was low (pedestrian) to moderate (driving). Findings are discussed from the perspective of cognitive and visual distractions. Policy and behavioral efforts should continue to reduce mobile technology use in transportation settings.

Citing Articles

"It's okay because I'm just driving": an exploration of self-reported mobile phone use among Mexican drivers.

Useche S, Alonso F, Faus M, Cervantes Trejo A, Castaneda I, Oviedo-Trespalacios O PeerJ. 2024; 12:e16899.

PMID: 38410804 PMC: 10896083. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16899.


Altered gait parameters in distracted walking: a bio-evolutionary and prognostic health perspective on passive listening and active responding during cell phone use.

Bazzi H, Cacace A Front Integr Neurosci. 2023; 17:1135495.

PMID: 38027460 PMC: 10668124. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2023.1135495.


An umbrella review of the benefits and risks associated with youths' interactions with electronic screens.

Sanders T, Noetel M, Parker P, Del Pozo Cruz B, Biddle S, Ronto R Nat Hum Behav. 2023; 8(1):82-99.

PMID: 37957284 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01712-8.


Evaluation of Psychophysical Fitness in Drivers over 65 Years of Age.

Mirabet E, Tortosa-Perez M, Tortosa F, Gonzalez-Sala F Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(13).

PMID: 37444761 PMC: 10341519. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11131927.


A hierarchical cluster analysis of young drivers based on their perceived risk and frequency of texting while driving.

Hayashi Y, Friedel J, Foreman A, Wirth O J Safety Res. 2023; 85:398-404.

PMID: 37330889 PMC: 10425917. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.04.007.


References
1.
Mayhew D, Simpson H, Pak A . Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2003; 35(5):683-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00047-7. View

2.
Klauer S, Ehsani J, McGehee D, Manser M . The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk. J Adolesc Health. 2015; 57(1 Suppl):S36-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.03.014. View

3.
Schlehofer M, Thompson S, Ting S, Ostermann S, Nierman A, Skenderian J . Psychological predictors of college students' cell phone use while driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2010; 42(4):1107-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.024. View

4.
Keating D . Understanding adolescent development: implications for driving safety. J Safety Res. 2007; 38(2):147-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.02.002. View

5.
Foss R, Goodwin A . Distracted driver behaviors and distracting conditions among adolescent drivers: findings from a naturalistic driving study. J Adolesc Health. 2014; 54(5 Suppl):S50-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.005. View