» Articles » PMID: 28503100

Age and Gender Considerations for Technology-assisted Delivery of Therapy for Substance Use Disorder Treatment: A Patient Survey of Access to Electronic Devices

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2017 May 16
PMID 28503100
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Technology-assisted treatment (TAT) can be an effective supplement to established face-to-face therapy modalities with a growing literature in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. TAT access, interest, and familiarity are potential limitations to the use and efficacy of these approaches to treatment.

Methods: 174 participants in outpatient SUD treatment were administered a survey regarding technology device and Internet access, and interest in engaging in TAT SUD counseling (SUDC). The group was dichotomized by mean age and gender to examine potential variations in in these subgroups.

Results: Forty-three (43%) of participants were female, and the mean age was 44.8 years, and 89% of participants had Internet access. 83% of participants were interested in TAT for SUD counseling; 81% expected it to be at least "moderately helpful." 34% of participants noted they would choose to continue face-to-face therapy exclusively. 91% of participants had cell phones, but only 50% could access data or the Internet via their handheld device. 80% of participants stated they would be interested in trying SUDC via their phone. Women had a higher preference for computer-based SUDC than men, with gender being significantly correlated with TAT perceive helpfulness.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that patients in outpatient SUD treatment have access to resources for TAT implementation, although access was not always readily available. Future research will be needed to determine whether the technology that this population possesses will be able to support the evolving TAT modalities and whether interest in TAT across age and gender groups equalizes over time.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and acceptability of wearing a neuromodulation device at night in individuals in recovery from opioid use disorder.

Meads K, Huettner S, Amata D, Johnson H, Devine J, Warnakulasuriya S Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1481795.

PMID: 39676914 PMC: 11640868. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1481795.


Technology-Based Substance Use Interventions: Opportunities for Gender-Transformative Health Promotion.

Stinson J, Wolfson L, Poole N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(3).

PMID: 32033304 PMC: 7037203. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030992.

References
1.
Ondersma S, Svikis D, Thacker L, Beatty J, Lockhart N . Computer-delivered screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) for postpartum drug use: a randomized trial. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013; 46(1):52-9. PMC: 3818299. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.07.013. View

2.
Carroll K, Ball S, Martino S, Nich C, Babuscio T, Rounsaville B . Enduring effects of a computer-assisted training program for cognitive behavioral therapy: a 6-month follow-up of CBT4CBT. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008; 100(1-2):178-81. PMC: 2742309. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.015. View

3.
Dahne J, Lejuez C . Smartphone and Mobile Application Utilization Prior to and Following Treatment Among Individuals Enrolled in Residential Substance Use Treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015; 58:95-9. PMC: 4581950. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.06.017. View

4.
VanDeMark N, Burrell N, LaMendola W, Hoich C, Berg N, Medina E . An exploratory study of engagement in a technology-supported substance abuse intervention. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2010; 5:10. PMC: 2898791. DOI: 10.1186/1747-597X-5-10. View

5.
Milward J, Day E, Wadsworth E, Strang J, Lynskey M . Mobile phone ownership, usage and readiness to use by patients in drug treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 146:111-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.11.001. View