» Articles » PMID: 28500906

Feasibility and Reliability of a Mobile Tool to Evaluate Exposure to Tobacco Product Marketing and Messages Using Ecological Momentary Assessment

Overview
Journal Addict Behav
Date 2017 May 14
PMID 28500906
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Existing measures of tobacco marketing and messaging exposure are limited, relying on recall, recognition, or proxy measures. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and reliability of a mobile application for the measurement of tobacco and e-cigarette marketing and message exposure using ecological momentary assessment (EMA).

Methods: Young adults from Austin, TX (n=181, ages 18-29) were instructed to use a mobile application to record all sightings of marketing or social media related to tobacco (including e-cigarettes) in real-time for 28days (Event EMAs). Tobacco product use and recall of message encounters were assessed daily using an app-initiated EMA (Daily EMAs).

Results: The mobile app was a feasible and acceptable method to measure exposure to tobacco messages. The majority of messages (45.0%) were seen on the Internet, and many were user-generated. Thirty-day recall of messages at baseline was poorly correlated with messages reported via Event EMA during the study period; however, the correlation between post-study 30-day recall and Event EMA was much stronger (r=0.603 for industry-sponsored messages, r=0.599 for user-generated messages). Correlations between Daily EMAs and 30-day recall of message exposure (baseline and post-study) were small (baseline: r=0.329-0.389) to large (post-study: r=0.656-0.766).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that EMA is a feasible and reliable method for measuring tobacco message exposure, especially given the prevalence of messages encountered online and on social media. Recall measures are limited in their ability to accurately represent marketing exposure, but might be improved by a period of priming or clearer response categories.

Citing Articles

Recognition of Online E-cigarette Marketing and E-cigarette-Related Attitudes and Behaviors Among Young Adults.

Donaldson S, Beard T, Chen-Sankey J, Ganz O, Wackowski O, Allem J Nicotine Tob Res. 2024; 27(1):73-79.

PMID: 38989961 PMC: 11663800. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae167.


Causal effects of point-of-sale cigarette promotions and subjective social status on cigarette craving: a randomised within-person experiment.

Andrews M, Cooper N, Mattan B, Carreras-Tartak J, Paul A, Strasser A Tob Control. 2023; .

PMID: 37949653 PMC: 11082063. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2023-058069.


Testing if attitudes mediate the association between advertising exposure and adolescent tobacco use.

Roberts M, Keller-Hamilton B, Ferketich A Addict Behav. 2022; 134:107415.

PMID: 35763986 PMC: 11688602. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107415.


Tobacco messages encountered in real-time among low socio-economic position groups: a descriptive study.

Stevens E, Vazquez-Otero C, Li X, Arya M, Vallone D, Minsky S BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):2136.

PMID: 34801012 PMC: 8606061. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12197-3.


Real-Time Context of Tobacco Marketing Exposure and Community Vulnerability-An Ecological Momentary Assessment Among Young Adults.

Chen-Sankey J, van de Venne J, Westneat S, Rahman B, Folger S, Anesetti-Rothermel A Ann Behav Med. 2021; 56(6):620-631.

PMID: 34323267 PMC: 9242544. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaab066.


References
1.
Cole-Lewis H, Pugatch J, Sanders A, Varghese A, Posada S, Yun C . Social Listening: A Content Analysis of E-Cigarette Discussions on Twitter. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(10):e243. PMC: 4642379. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4969. View

2.
Mantey D, Cooper M, Clendennen S, Pasch K, Perry C . E-Cigarette Marketing Exposure Is Associated With E-Cigarette Use Among US Youth. J Adolesc Health. 2016; 58(6):686-90. PMC: 4900536. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.003. View

3.
Wackowski O, Lewis M, Delnevo C . Qualitative analysis of Camel Snus' website message board--users' product perceptions, insights and online interactions. Tob Control. 2010; 20(2):e1. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2010.037911. View

4.
Grunberg N, Winders S, Wewers M . Gender differences in tobacco use. Health Psychol. 1991; 10(2):143-53. View

5.
Choi W, Harris K, Okuyemi K, Ahluwalia J . Predictors of smoking initiation among college-bound high school students. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 26(1):69-74. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_09. View