» Articles » PMID: 28500415

Mind-muscle Connection Training Principle: Influence of Muscle Strength and Training Experience During a Pushing Movement

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2017 May 14
PMID 28500415
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of different attentional focus conditions on muscle activity during the push-up exercise and to assess the possible influence of muscle strength and training experience.

Methods: Eighteen resistance-trained men performed 1RM bench press testing and were familiarized with the procedure during the first session. In the second session, three different conditions were randomly performed: regular push-up and push-up focusing on using the pectoralis major and triceps brachii muscles, respectively. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded and analyzed (EMG normalized to max; nEMG) for the triceps brachii and pectoralis major muscles.

Results: Participants had on average 8 (SD 6) years of training experience and 1RM of 1.25 (SD 0.28) kg per kg bodyweight. Focusing on using pectoralis major increased activity in this muscle by 9% nEMG (95% CI 5-13; Cohen's d 0.60) compared with the regular condition. Triceps activity was not significantly influenced by triceps focus although borderline significant, with a mean difference of 5% nEMG (95% CI 0-10; Cohen's d 0.30). However, years of training experience was positively associated with the ability to selectively activate the triceps (β = 0.41, P = 0.04), but not the pectoralis. Bench press 1RM was not significantly associated with the ability to selectively activate the muscles.

Conclusion: Pectoralis activity can be increased when focusing on using this muscle during push-ups, whereas the ability to do this for the triceps is dependent on years of training experience. Maximal muscle strength does not appear to be a decisive factor for the ability to selectively activate these muscles.

Citing Articles

Appropriate Reporting of Exercise Variables in Resistance Training Protocols: Much more than Load and Number of Repetitions.

Coratella G Sports Med Open. 2022; 8(1):99.

PMID: 35907047 PMC: 9339067. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-022-00492-1.


An Electromyographic Analysis of Lateral Raise Variations and Frontal Raise in Competitive Bodybuilders.

Coratella G, Tornatore G, Longo S, Esposito F, Ce E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(17).

PMID: 32824894 PMC: 7503819. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176015.


Evaluation of the Lower Limb Muscles' Electromyographic Activity during the Leg Press Exercise and Its Variants: A Systematic Review.

Martin-Fuentes I, Oliva-Lozano J, Muyor J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(13).

PMID: 32605065 PMC: 7369968. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134626.


Influence of a self-regulated cognitive dual task on time to failure and complexity of submaximal isometric force control.

Cruz-Montecinos C, Calatayud J, Iturriaga C, Bustos C, Mena B, Espana-Romero V Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018; 118(9):2021-2027.

PMID: 29987354 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3936-6.

References
1.
Knapik J, Sharp M, Canham-Chervak M, Hauret K, Patton J, Jones B . Risk factors for training-related injuries among men and women in basic combat training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33(6):946-54. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200106000-00014. View

2.
Burden A . How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010; 20(6):1023-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004. View

3.
Calatayud J, Vinstrup J, Jakobsen M, Sundstrup E, Brandt M, Jay K . Importance of mind-muscle connection during progressive resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015; 116(3):527-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-015-3305-7. View

4.
Rutherford O, Jones D . The role of learning and coordination in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986; 55(1):100-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF00422902. View

5.
Wulf G, McConnel N, Gartner M, Schwarz A . Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. J Mot Behav. 2002; 34(2):171-82. DOI: 10.1080/00222890209601939. View