» Articles » PMID: 28499555

Evaluating Biomechanics of User-selected Sitting and Standing Computer Workstation

Overview
Journal Appl Ergon
Specialty Psychology
Date 2017 May 14
PMID 28499555
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A standing computer workstation has now become a popular modern work place intervention to reduce sedentary behavior at work. However, user's interaction related to a standing computer workstation and its differences with a sitting workstation need to be understood to assist in developing recommendations for use and set up. The study compared the differences in upper extremity posture and muscle activity between user-selected sitting and standing workstation setups. Twenty participants (10 females, 10 males) volunteered for the study. 3-D posture, surface electromyography, and user-reported discomfort were measured while completing simulated tasks with each participant's self-selected workstation setups. Sitting computer workstation associated with more non-neutral shoulder postures and greater shoulder muscle activity, while standing computer workstation induced greater wrist adduction angle and greater extensor carpi radialis muscle activity. Sitting computer workstation also associated with greater shoulder abduction postural variation (90th-10th percentile) while standing computer workstation associated with greater variation for should rotation and wrist extension. Users reported similar overall discomfort levels within the first 10 min of work but had more than twice as much discomfort while standing than sitting after 45 min; with most discomfort reported in the low back for standing and shoulder for sitting. These different measures provide understanding in users' different interactions with sitting and standing and by alternating between the two configurations in short bouts may be a way of changing the loading pattern on the upper extremity.

Citing Articles

Effects of Postural Changes Using a Standing Desk on the Craniovertebral Angle, Muscle Fatigue, Work Performance, and Discomfort in Individuals with a Forward Head Posture.

Lee H, Lee Y Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(23).

PMID: 39685059 PMC: 11641771. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12232436.


TouchView: Mid-Air Touch on Zoomable 2D View for Distant Freehand Selection on a Virtual Reality User Interface.

Kim W, Xiong S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(22).

PMID: 39598980 PMC: 11598294. DOI: 10.3390/s24227202.


Towards in-field assessment of humeral and scapular kinematics: a comparison between laboratory and field settings using inertial sensors.

Lordall J, Akinluyi O, Lang A Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1349570.

PMID: 38481467 PMC: 10933028. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1349570.


The Effects of Standing Working Posture on Operation Force and Upper Limb Muscle Activation When Using Different Pointing Devices.

Choi J, Lin Y, Loh P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(16).

PMID: 36011848 PMC: 9408334. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610217.


Investigating the Effect of Keyboard Distance on the Posture and 3D Moments of Wrist and Elbow Joints among Males Using OpenSim.

Gholami M, Choobineh A, Abdoli-Eramaki M, Dehghan A, Karimi M Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022; 2022:5751488.

PMID: 35572063 PMC: 9098337. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5751488.