» Articles » PMID: 28498235

Hospital Minimally Invasive Surgery Utilization for Gastrointestinal Cancer

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2017 May 13
PMID 28498235
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of receiving care at high minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-utilizing hospitals BACKGROUND:: MIS techniques are used across surgical specialties. The extent of MIS utilization for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer resection and impact of receiving care at high utilizing hospitals is unclear.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 137,581 surgically resected esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, hepatobiliary, colon, and rectal cancer patients within the National Cancer Data Base (2010-2013). Disease-specific, hospital-level, reliability-adjusted MIS utilization rates were calculated to evaluate perioperative outcomes. Among patients for whom adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was indicated, the association between days to AC and hospital MIS utilization was examined using generalized estimating equations. Association with risk of death was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression.

Results: Disease-specific MIS use increased significantly [42.0%-68.3% increase; trend test, P < 0.001 for all except hepatobiliary (P = 0.007)] over time. Most hospitals [range-30.3% (colon); 92.9% (pancreatic)] were low utilizers (≤30% of cases). Higher MIS utilization is associated with increased lymph nodes examined (P < 0.001, all) and shorter length of stay (P < 0.001, all). Each 10% increase in MIS utilization is associated with fewer days to AC [3.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.3) for MIS gastric; 3.3 ([0.7-5.8) for open gastric; 1.1 (0.3-2.0) days for open colon]. An association between MIS utilization and risk of death was observed for colon [Q2-hazard ratio (HR) 0.96 (0.89-1.02); Q3-HR 0.91 (0.86-0.98); Q4-HR 0.87 (0.82-0.93)] and rectal cancer [Q2-HR 0.89 (0.76-1.05); Q3-HR 0.84 (0.82-0.97); Q4-HR 0.86 (0.74-0.98)].

Conclusions: Most hospitals treating GI malignancies are low MIS utilizers. Our findings may reflect real-world MIS effectiveness for oncologic resection and could be useful for identifying hospitals with infrastructure and/or processes beneficial for multimodality cancer care.

Citing Articles

Measures to Achieve Quality in Minimally Invasive Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgery: A Perspective From a Low-Volume Country.

Chao P, Koea J, Hill A, Srinivasa S Ann Surg Open. 2023; 4(1):e232.

PMID: 37600890 PMC: 10431266. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000232.


The optimal dose of oxycodone in PCIA after laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Zhou Y, Huang X, Chang H, Sun H, Xie W, Pan Z Front Surg. 2023; 10:1111376.

PMID: 37009602 PMC: 10065146. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1111376.


Evaluation of Advanced Bimanual Skills in Novices Using the Wrist-Like FlexDex™ Articulating Laparoscopic Needle Holder in 2D and 3D Vision: A Randomised Trial.

Motahariasl N, Farzaneh S, Motahariasl S, Kokotkin I, Sousi S, Zargaran A Med Devices (Auckl). 2022; 14:469-480.

PMID: 35002336 PMC: 8722694. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S344975.


Quality and Location of the Surgical Episode Mediate a Large Proportion of Socioeconomic-Based Survival Disparities in Patients with Resected Stage I-III Colon Cancer.

Swords D, Bednarski B, Messick C, Tillman M, Chang G, You Y Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 29(1):706-716.

PMID: 34406541 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10643-5.


Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years.

Schneider M, Gero D, Muller M, Horisberger K, Rickenbacher A, Turina M Surg Endosc. 2020; 35(11):6227-6243.

PMID: 33206242 PMC: 8523463. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08123-0.