» Articles » PMID: 28497388

First Experience with Electronic Feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in Pediatric Cancer Care

Overview
Specialties Critical Care
Oncology
Date 2017 May 13
PMID 28497388
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is a brief family screener, identifying families at universal or elevated risk for psychosocial problems. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and usability of the electronic PAT (ePAT) in pediatric cancer care.

Methods: Eighty-six parents of newly diagnosed children with cancer (0-18 years) agreed to participate and registered at the website www.hetklikt.nu (58%). Seventy-five families completed the ePAT at approximately 1 month post-diagnosis. Answers were transformed into an electronic PROfile (PAT ePROfile) and fed back to the psychosocial team. Team members completed a semi-structured evaluation questionnaire. Feasibility was measured as the percentage of website registrations, completed ePATs, and PAT ePROfiles reviewed or discussed by the team. Usability included perceived match of the PAT ePROfile with the team's own risk estimation, perceived added value, and perceived actions undertaken as a result of the PAT ePROfile.

Results: Feasibility was 70% for website registration, 87% for completed ePATs, 85% for PAT ePROfile reviewing, and 67% for ePROfile discussion. Team members reported that the PAT ePROfile matched with their own risk estimation (M = 7.92, SD = 1.88) and did not provide additional information (M = 2.18, SD = 2.30). According to the team, actions were undertaken for 25% of the families as a result of the PAT ePROfile. More actions were undertaken for families with elevated risk scores compared to universal risk scores (p = .007).

Conclusions: Implementation of the ePAT seems generally feasible, but it is not always clear how this screener adds to current clinical practice. Strategies should be developed together with team members to improve quick exchange of ePAT results and allocate care according to the needs of the families.

Citing Articles

Moving from development to implementation of digital innovations within the NHS: myHealthE, a remote monitoring system for tracking patient outcomes in child and adolescent mental health services.

Morris A, Ibrahim Z, Moghraby O, Stringaris A, Grant I, Zalewski L Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076231211551.

PMID: 37954687 PMC: 10638880. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231211551.


Implementation of child-centred outcome measures in routine paediatric healthcare practice: a systematic review.

Scott H, Braybrook D, Hardardottir D, Ellis-Smith C, Harding R Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023; 21(1):63.

PMID: 37394520 PMC: 10316621. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02143-9.


Families following pediatric traumatic medical events: identifying psychosocial risk profiles using latent profile analysis.

Sadeh Y, Dekel R, Brezner A, Landa J, Silberg T Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022; 13(2):2116825.

PMID: 36186160 PMC: 9518403. DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2116825.


Assessing the feasibility of a web-based outcome measurement system in child and adolescent mental health services - myHealthE a randomised controlled feasibility pilot study.

Morris A, Ibrahim Z, Heslin M, Moghraby O, Stringaris A, Grant I Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2022; 28(1):128-147.

PMID: 35684987 PMC: 10083915. DOI: 10.1111/camh.12571.


Evaluation of an electronic psycho-oncological adaptive screening program (EPAS) with immediate patient feedback: findings from a German cluster intervention study.

Esser P, Sautier L, Sarkar S, Schilling G, Bokemeyer C, Koch U J Cancer Surviv. 2021; 16(6):1401-1413.

PMID: 34735695 PMC: 9630178. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01121-8.


References
1.
Jaspers J, Kamps W, Klip E . Risk factors for psychological maladjustment of parents of children with cancer. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999; 38(12):1526-35. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199912000-00014. View

2.
McCarthy M, DeGraves S, Wakefield C, Bowden M, Marks L, Williams L . The association of psychosocial screening and service provision in pediatric oncology: the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0) into clinical practice. Support Care Cancer. 2016; 24(7):2945-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3107-4. View

3.
Wijnberg-Williams B, Kamps W, Klip E, Hoekstra-Weebers J . Psychological adjustment of parents of pediatric cancer patients revisited: five years later. Psychooncology. 2005; 15(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1002/pon.927. View

4.
Alderfer M, Mougianis I, Barakat L, Beele D, Ditaranto S, Hwang W . Family psychosocial risk, distress, and service utilization in pediatric cancer: predictive validity of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool. Cancer. 2009; 115(18 Suppl):4339-49. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24587. View

5.
McCarthy M, Wakefield C, DeGraves S, Bowden M, Eyles D, Williams L . Feasibility of clinical psychosocial screening in pediatric oncology: Implementing the PAT2.0. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2016; 34(5):363-75. DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1210273. View