» Articles » PMID: 28496852

Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation: Methods for Assessment, Targets for Ventricular Rate During AF, and Clinical Relevance for Device Therapy

Overview
Date 2017 May 13
PMID 28496852
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rate control is a widely used treatment strategy for management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Multiple studies have shown that pharmacologic rate control is as effective as pharmacologic rhythm control for management of AF. A snapshot ECG or intermittent monitoring using Holters is the most widely used technique for assessing ventricular rate during AF. Patients with implantable devices, such as pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, and implantable loop recorders provide the ability for continuous long term monitoring of AF and ventricular rate during AF. It has been shown that continuous monitoring of AF and ventricular rate during AF by implantable devices is the most comprehensive method for assessment of AF occurrence and poor rate control, particularly in patients with paroxysmal and asymptomatic AF. Rapid ventricular rate during AF, as assessed by implantable devices, has been shown to cause reduction in cardiac resynchronization therapy, predict inappropriate defibrillation therapy, and identify increased risk for cardiovascular hospitalizations. The ventricular rate targets for achieving good rate control during AF depend on the patient characteristics with stricter targets recommended for patient with compromised functional capacity, such as patients with HF. Thus it can be hypothesized that timely intervention based on continuous assessment of AF and poor rate control, with ventricular rate targets defined based on cardiovascular disease state, may improve clinical outcomes in patients with AF.

Citing Articles

Clinical features between paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: a comparative analysis in eastern China.

Liu L, Wu Z, Kong W, Qiu B, Wang Z, Sun J J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 19(1):591.

PMID: 39367417 PMC: 11451112. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-03097-9.


A virtual platform to deliver ambulatory care for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Weng W, Blanchard C, Reed J, Matheson K, McIntyre C, Gray C Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2022; 2(1):63-70.

PMID: 35265891 PMC: 8890105. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.005.

References
1.
BOOTSMA B, Hoelsen A, Strackee J, Meijler F . Analysis of R-R intervals in patients with atrial fibrillation at rest and during exercise. Circulation. 1970; 41(5):783-94. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.41.5.783. View

2.
Cleland J, Swedberg K, Follath F, Komajda M, Cohen-Solal A, Aguilar J . The EuroHeart Failure survey programme-- a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe. Part 1: patient characteristics and diagnosis. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24(5):442-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00823-0. View

3.
Wang T, Larson M, Levy D, Vasan R, Leip E, Wolf P . Temporal relations of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure and their joint influence on mortality: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2003; 107(23):2920-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072767.89944.6E. View

4.
Hilliard A, Miller T, Hodge D, Gibbons R . Heart rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation referred for exercise testing. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 102(6):704-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.04.051. View

5.
Sarkar S, Ritscher D, Mehra R . A detector for a chronic implantable atrial tachyarrhythmia monitor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008; 55(3):1219-24. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.903707. View