» Articles » PMID: 28496344

Adherence to Disease-modifying Therapies and Its Impact on Relapse, Health Resource Utilization, and Costs Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 May 13
PMID 28496344
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate adherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) initiating oral and injectable DMTs, and to estimate the impact of adherence on relapse, health resource utilization, and medical costs.

Patients And Methods: Commercially insured MS patients (aged 18-65 years, two or more MS diagnoses, one or more DMT claims) with continuous eligibility 12 months before and after the first DMT claim date (index date) and no DMT claim during the pre-index period were identified from a large commerical claims database for the period from January 1, 2008, to September 30, 2015. Adherence to the index DMT was measured by the 12-month post-index proportion of days covered (PDC) and compared between oral and injectable DMT initiators. After adjustment for sex, age at index DMT, and comorbidities, regression models examined the relationship between adherence and relapse risk, MS-related health resource utilization, and non-drug medical costs (2015 US$).

Results: The study covered 12,431 patients and nine DMTs. Adherence to the index DMT did not differ significantly between oral (n=1,018) and injectable (n=11,413) DMTs when assessed by mean PDC (0.7257±0.2934 vs 0.7259±0.2869, respectively; =0.0787), or percentages achieving PDC ≥0.8 (61.4% vs 58.6%, respectively; =0.0806). Compared to non-adherence, adherence to DMT significantly reduced the likelihood of relapse in the post-index 12 months by 42%, hospitalization by 52%, and emergency visits by 38% (all, <0.0001). Adherent patients would be expected to have on average 0.7 fewer outpatient visits annually versus non-adherent patients (<0.0001). Based on the differences in predicted mean costs, adherence (vs non-adherence) would decrease the total annual medical care costs by $5,816 per patient, including hospitalization costs by $1,953, emergency visits by $171, and outpatient visits by $2,802.

Conclusion: Adherence remains suboptimal but comparable between oral and injectable DMTs. Potential health and economic benefits underscore the importance of improving adherence in MS.

Citing Articles

TEC-ADHERE: Real-World Persistence and Adherence on Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the French OroSEP Patient-Support Program.

Labauge P, Creange A, Moreau T, Nouvet-Gire J, Pedespan B, Heinzlef O Neurol Ther. 2024; 14(1):177-192.

PMID: 39527163 PMC: 11762029. DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00674-x.


Costs of Potential Medication Wastage Due to Switching Treatment Among People With Multiple Sclerosis.

Okuda D, Patel A, Schuldt R, Abioye I, Bonine N J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2024; 11(2):103-108.

PMID: 39479558 PMC: 11523564. DOI: 10.36469/001c.123336.


Multiple sclerosis relapse presenting as trigeminal neuralgia.

Rabadi M Radiol Case Rep. 2024; 19(8):3545-3547.

PMID: 38948901 PMC: 11214334. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.05.035.


Adherence, Persistence, Switching and Costs of Injectable and Oral Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis. Real Life Analysis Over 6 Years of Treatment.

Santoleri F, Lasala R, Berardini E, Vernacchio F, Leo D, Costantini A Hosp Pharm. 2024; 59(4):476-484.

PMID: 38919754 PMC: 11195840. DOI: 10.1177/00185787241232615.


Personalized Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence for Persons with Multiple Sclerosis.

Neter E, Esterkin-Hubner E, Glass-Marmor L, Wolkowitz A, Lavi I, Miller A Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024; 18:1195-1203.

PMID: 38895639 PMC: 11182877. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S455518.


References
1.
Chastek B, Oleen-Burkey M, Lopez-Bresnahan M . Medical chart validation of an algorithm for identifying multiple sclerosis relapse in healthcare claims. J Med Econ. 2010; 13(4):618-25. DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2010.523670. View

2.
Lizan L, Comellas M, Paz S, Poveda J, Meletiche D, Polanco C . Treatment adherence and other patient-reported outcomes as cost determinants in multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014; 8:1653-64. PMC: 4262214. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S67253. View

3.
Bergvall N, Petrilla A, Karkare S, Lahoz R, Agashivala N, Pradhan A . Persistence with and adherence to fingolimod compared with other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims database analysis. J Med Econ. 2014; 17(10):696-707. DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2014.940422. View

4.
Steinberg S, Faris R, Chang C, Chan A, Tankersley M . Impact of adherence to interferons in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a non-experimental, retrospective, cohort study. Clin Drug Investig. 2010; 30(2):89-100. DOI: 10.2165/11533330-000000000-00000. View

5.
Scalfari A, Neuhaus A, Degenhardt A, Rice G, Muraro P, Daumer M . The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study 10: relapses and long-term disability. Brain. 2010; 133(Pt 7):1914-29. PMC: 2892939. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awq118. View