» Articles » PMID: 28490836

Prior Knowledge of Target Direction and Intended Movement Selection Improves Indirect Reaching Movement Decoding

Overview
Journal Behav Neurol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2017 May 12
PMID 28490836
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that target direction information presented by the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) during movement planning could be incorporated into neural decoder for achieving better decoding performance. It is still unknown whether the neural decoder combined with only target direction could work in more complex tasks where obstacles impeded direct reaching paths. In this study, spike activities were collected from the PMd of two monkeys when performing a delayed obstacle-avoidance task. We examined how target direction and intended movement selection were encoded in neuron population activities of the PMd during movement planning. The decoding performances of movement trajectory were compared for three neural decoders with no prior knowledge, or only target direction, or both target direction and intended movement selection integrated into a mixture of trajectory model (MTM). We found that not only target direction but also intended movement selection was presented in neural activities of the PMd during movement planning. It was further confirmed by quantitative analysis. Combined with prior knowledge, the trajectory decoder achieved the best performance among three decoders. Recruiting prior knowledge about target direction and intended movement selection extracted from the PMd could enhance the decoding performance of hand trajectory in indirect reaching movement.

References
1.
Hoshi E, Tanji J . Integration of target and body-part information in the premotor cortex when planning action. Nature. 2000; 408(6811):466-70. DOI: 10.1038/35044075. View

2.
Pearce T, Moran D . Strategy-dependent encoding of planned arm movements in the dorsal premotor cortex. Science. 2012; 337(6097):984-8. PMC: 3667666. DOI: 10.1126/science.1220642. View

3.
Kemere C, Santhanam G, Yu B, Afshar A, Ryu S, Meng T . Detecting neural-state transitions using hidden Markov models for motor cortical prostheses. J Neurophysiol. 2008; 100(4):2441-52. PMC: 2576226. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00924.2007. View

4.
Carmena J, Lebedev M, Crist R, ODoherty J, Santucci D, Dimitrov D . Learning to control a brain-machine interface for reaching and grasping by primates. PLoS Biol. 2003; 1(2):E42. PMC: 261882. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000042. View

5.
Bishop W, Yu B, Santhanam G, Afshar A, Ryu S, Shenoy K . The use of a virtual integration environment for the real-time implementation of neural decode algorithms. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2008:628-33. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649231. View