» Articles » PMID: 28488177

Anastomotic Complications After Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy Constructed by Circular Stapler (OrVil) Versus Linear Stapler (overlap Method)

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 May 11
PMID 28488177
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is the most technically difficult type of anastomosis; thus, anastomotic complications such as leakage and stenosis sometimes occur. Identification of the safest anastomotic procedure is important for successful LTG. We have performed LTG since 2004 either with a circular stapler using an OrVil anvil or via the overlap Orringer method with a linear stapler. This retrospective study aimed to determine which method results in a lower incidence of anastomotic complications in patients undergoing LTG.

Methods: Data on 188 consecutive patients who underwent LTG between April 2004 and August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into those who underwent esophagojejunostomy performed via a circular stapler using an OrVil anvil (group C, n = 49) or via the overlap method (group L, n = 139).

Results: Anastomotic complications occurred in five of 188 esophagojejunostomies (2.7%). They comprised three cases of leakage (1.6%), and two of stenosis (1.1%). There was no significant difference in patient characteristics or hematological variables between groups C and L. There was no significant difference between groups in operation time, blood loss, lymph node dissection, and intraoperative anastomotic problems. The rate of anastomotic complications was significantly lower in group L (0.7%, 1/139) than in group C (8.2%, 4/49; p = 0.005). In particular, anastomotic leakage in group L tended to be lower (0.7% 1/139) than in group C (4.1% 2/49), although this difference was not significant. The rate of anastomotic stenosis in group L was significantly lower (0%, 0/139) than in group C (4.1%, 2/49; p = 0.017). Furthermore multivariate analysis showed anastomotic procedure was an independent factor for anastomotic complication.

Conclusions: There were fewer anastomotic complications after overlap esophagojejunostomy than after esophagojejunostomy via the OrVil procedure, especially regarding anastomotic stenosis. We therefore recommend the overlap technique when performing esophagojejunostomy.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the safety of esophagojejunal overlap and π-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Song T, Liu M, Xu K, Xing J, Guo K, Qi X BMC Surg. 2025; 25(1):24.

PMID: 39810152 PMC: 11730524. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02703-w.


Esophagojejunostomy using a circular stapler vs. a linear stapler for gastric cardia cancer patients: impact of upper margin length and tumor size on the survival rate.

Dieudonne M, Lv R, Xie W, Liu Q, Jiang J, Fu Y Front Surg. 2024; 11:1385754.

PMID: 39444376 PMC: 11496302. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1385754.


Final results of a randomized controlled trial: comparison of the efficacy and safety between totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for advanced Siewert III esophagogastric junction cancer and upper and middle third....

Wang J, Liu S, Chen H, Luo J, Xu G, Feng X Int J Surg. 2024; 111(1):686-696.

PMID: 39185962 PMC: 11745745. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002062.


Short-term outcomes of distal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for gastric cancer under enhanced recovery after surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Lin Z, Yan M, Lin Z, Xu Y, Zheng H, Peng Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17594.

PMID: 39080478 PMC: 11289314. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68787-9.


Exploratory study on the impact of intraesophageal pressure on quality of life in patients following total gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Saeki Y, Tanabe K, Ota H, Chikuie E, Takemoto Y, Karakuchi N BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):217.

PMID: 39068411 PMC: 11282664. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02504-1.


References
1.
Nomura S, Sasako M, Katai H, Sano T, Maruyama K . Decreasing complication rates with stapled esophagojejunostomy following a learning curve. Gastric Cancer. 2002; 3(2):97-101. DOI: 10.1007/pl00011703. View

2.
. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14(2):113-23. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4. View

3.
Kanaji S, Ohyama M, Yasuda T, Sendo H, Suzuki S, Kawasaki K . Can the intraoperative leak test prevent postoperative leakage of esophagojejunal anastomosis after total gastrectomy?. Surg Today. 2015; 46(7):815-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-015-1243-y. View

4.
Zuiki T, Hosoya Y, Kaneda Y, Kurashina K, Saito S, Ui T . Stenosis after use of the double-stapling technique for reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(10):3683-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2945-0. View

5.
Jung Y, You G, Shin H, Rim H . Relationship between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and total lymphocyte count and mortality of hemodialysis patients. Hemodial Int. 2013; 18(1):104-12. DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12077. View