» Articles » PMID: 28487435

Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction with NSAIDs in Real World Use: Bayesian Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 May 11
PMID 28487435
Citations 156
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 To characterise the determinants, time course, and risks of acute myocardial infarction associated with use of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Systematic review followed by a one stage bayesian individual patient data meta-analysis. Studies from Canadian and European healthcare databases. Eligible studies were sourced from computerised drug prescription or medical databases, conducted in the general or an elderly population, documented acute myocardial infarction as specific outcome, studied selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors (including rofecoxib) and traditional NSAIDs, compared risk of acute myocardial infarction in NSAID users with non-users, allowed for time dependent analyses, and minimised effects of confounding and misclassification bias.  Drug exposure was modelled as an indicator variable incorporating the specific NSAID, its recency, duration of use, and dose. The outcome measures were the summary adjusted odds ratios of first acute myocardial infarction after study entry for each category of NSAID use at index date (date of acute myocardial infarction for cases, matched date for controls) versus non-use in the preceding year and the posterior probability of acute myocardial infarction. A cohort of 446 763 individuals including 61 460 with acute myocardial infarction was acquired. Taking any dose of NSAIDs for one week, one month, or more than a month was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction. With use for one to seven days the probability of increased myocardial infarction risk (posterior probability of odds ratio >1.0) was 92% for celecoxib, 97% for ibuprofen, and 99% for diclofenac, naproxen, and rofecoxib. The corresponding odds ratios (95% credible intervals) were 1.24 (0.91 to 1.82) for celecoxib, 1.48 (1.00 to 2.26) for ibuprofen, 1.50 (1.06 to 2.04) for diclofenac, 1.53 (1.07 to 2.33) for naproxen, and 1.58 (1.07 to 2.17) for rofecoxib. Greater risk of myocardial infarction was documented for higher dose of NSAIDs. With use for longer than one month, risks did not appear to exceed those associated with shorter durations. All NSAIDs, including naproxen, were found to be associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction. Risk of myocardial infarction with celecoxib was comparable to that of traditional NSAIDS and was lower than for rofecoxib. Risk was greatest during the first month of NSAID use and with higher doses.

Citing Articles

Generation of Risk Score for Serious Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Induced Cardiovascular Events (NAÏVE) Among Active-Duty Service Members and Veterans.

Atkinson T, Petway J, Forbes W, Thorfinnson H, Costantino R, Gressler L J Pain Res. 2025; 18:1081-1094.

PMID: 40066299 PMC: 11892502. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S503743.


The Effects of Trade Names on the Misuse of Some Over-The-Counter Drugs and Assessment of Community Knowledge and Attitudes in Alkarak, Jordan.

Shaqfeh M, Alsayed A, Hasoun L, Khader H, Zihlif M Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025; 18:2697-2708.

PMID: 39741872 PMC: 11687322. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S490277.


Inflammation in the Peri-ACS Period: Ready for Prime Time?.

Rao S, Lerner J Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2024; 27(1):20.

PMID: 39714732 DOI: 10.1007/s11883-024-01263-x.


Evaluating the Factors Associated With Increased Risk of Self-Reported Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With Arthritis.

Sharma A, Ananthan V, Yousaf H Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024; :15598276241254329.

PMID: 39554925 PMC: 11562468. DOI: 10.1177/15598276241254329.


Literature Review to Understand the Burden and Current Non-surgical Management of Moderate-Severe Pain Associated with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Castro-Dominguez F, Tibesku C, McAlindon T, Freitas R, Ivanavicius S, Kandaswamy P Rheumatol Ther. 2024; 11(6):1457-1499.

PMID: 39476083 PMC: 11557795. DOI: 10.1007/s40744-024-00720-y.


References
1.
Fortier I, Doiron D, Burton P, Raina P . Invited commentary: consolidating data harmonization--how to obtain quality and applicability?. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 174(3):261-4. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr194. View

2.
Baron J, Sandler R, Bresalier R, Lanas A, Morton D, Riddell R . Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib: final analysis of the APPROVe trial. Lancet. 2008; 372(9651):1756-64. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61490-7. View

3.
Warren F, Abrams K, Golder S, Sutton A . Systematic review of methods used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:64. PMC: 3528446. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-64. View

4.
Lambert P, Sutton A, Burton P, Abrams K, Jones D . How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS. Stat Med. 2005; 24(15):2401-28. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2112. View

5.
Greenland S . Basic problems in interaction assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 1993; 101 Suppl 4:59-66. PMC: 1519686. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.93101s459. View