» Articles » PMID: 28484818

Rives Technique for the Primary Larger Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Prospective Study of 1000 Repairs

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2017 May 10
PMID 28484818
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We report a prospective study of repairs using the Rives technique of the more difficult primary inguinal hernias, focusing on the immediate post-operative period, clinical recurrence, testicular atrophy, and chronic pain. A mesh placed in the preperitoneal space can reduce recurrences and chronic pain.

Methods: For the larger primary inguinal hernias (Types 3, 4, 6, and some 7), we favour preperitoneal placement of a mesh, covering the myopectineal orifice by means of a transinguinal (Rives technique) approach. The Rives technique was performed on 943 patients (1000 repairs), preferably under local anaesthesia plus sedation in ambulatory surgery.

Results: The mean operative time was 31.8 min. Pain assessment after 24 h with an Andersen scale and a categorical scale gave two patients with intense pain on the Andersen scale, and four patients who thought their state was bad. Surgical wound complications were below 1%, and urinary retention was 1.2% mostly associated with spinal anaesthesia and, in one case, bladder perforation. There was spermatic cord and testicular oedema with some degree of orchitis in 17 patients. The clinical follow-up of 849 repairs (86.4%), mean (range) 30.0 (12-192) months, gave five recurrences (0.6%), three cases (0.4%) of testicular atrophy, and 37 (4.3%) of post-operative chronic pain (8 patients with visual analogue scale of 3-10).

Conclusions: The Rives technique requires a sound knowledge of inguinal preperitoneal space anatomy, but it is an excellent technique for the larger and difficult primary inguinal hernias, giving a low rate of recurrences and chronic pain.

Citing Articles

RETention of urine After INguinal hernia Elective Repair (RETAINER study I and II).

Croghan S, Fleming C, Mohan H, Harji D, Bolger J, Elliott J Int J Surg Protoc. 2021; 25(1):42-54.

PMID: 34013144 PMC: 8114841. DOI: 10.29337/ijsp.137.

References
1.
Chan G, Chan C . The characteristics of inguinal hernia recurrence in the modern era and the long-term outcomes after re-operation. Hernia. 2011; 15(2):193-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-010-0771-z. View

2.
Mui W, Ng C, Fung T, Cheung F, Wong C, Ma T . Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2006; 244(1):27-33. PMC: 1570605. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217691.81562.7e. View

3.
Read R . Recent advances in the repair of groin herniation. Curr Probl Surg. 2003; 40(1):13-79. DOI: 10.1067/msg.2003.127928a. View

4.
Kingsnorth A, Skandalakis P, Colborn G, Weidman T, Skandalakis L, SKANDALAKIS J . Embryology, anatomy, and surgical applications of the preperitoneal space. Surg Clin North Am. 2000; 80(1):1-24. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70394-7. View

5.
Simons M, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot J, Campanelli G, Conze J . European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009; 13(4):343-403. PMC: 2719730. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7. View