» Articles » PMID: 28482892

A Preliminary Investigation into the Design of Pressure Cushions and Their Potential Applications for Forearm Robotic Orthoses

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 May 10
PMID 28482892
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Load cells are often used in rehabilitation robotics to monitor human-robot interaction. While load cells are accurate and suitable for the stationary end-point robots used in rehabilitation hospitals, their cost and inability to conform to the shape of the body hinder their application in developing affordable and wearable robotic orthoses for assisting individuals in the activities of daily living. This exploratory work investigates the possibility of using an alternative technology, namely compliant polymeric air cushions, to measure interaction forces between the user and a wearable rigid structure.

Methods: A polymeric air cushion was designed, analyzed using a finite element model (FEM), and tested using a bench-top characterization system. The cushions underwent repeatability testing, and signal delay testing from a step response while increasing the length of the cushion's tubes. Subsequently, a 3D printed wrist brace prototype was integrated with six polymeric air cushions and tested in static conditions where a volunteer exerted isometric pronation/supination torque and forces in vertical and horizontal directions. The load measured by integrating data recorded by the six sensors was compared with force data measured by a high quality load cell and torque sensor.

Results: The FEM and experimental data comparison was within the error bounds of the external differential pressure sensor used to monitor the pressure inside the cushion. The ratio obtained experimentally between the pressure inside the pressure cushion and the 8 N applied load deviated by only 1.28% from the FEM. A drift smaller than 1% was observed over 10 cycles. The rise times of the cushion under an 8 N step response for a 0.46, 1.03, and 2.02 m length tube was 0.45, 0.39, and 0.37 s. Tests with the wrist brace showed a moderate root mean square error (RMSE) between the force estimated by the pressure cushions and the external load cells. Specifically, the RMSE was 13 mNm, 500 mN, and 1.24 N for forearm pronation/supination torque, vertical force, and horizontal force, respectively.

Conclusions: The use of compliant pressure cushions was shown to be promising for monitoring interaction forces between the forearm and a rigid brace. This work lays the foundation for the future design of an array of pressure cushions for robotic orthoses. Future research should also investigate the compatibility of these polymeric cushions for data acquisition during functional magnetic resonance imaging in shielded rooms.

Citing Articles

3D Scanning of the Forearm for Orthosis and HMI Applications.

Perry J, Brower J, Carne R, Bogert M Front Robot AI. 2021; 8:576783.

PMID: 33937344 PMC: 8079810. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.576783.


Integration of 3D Printed Flexible Pressure Sensors into Physical Interfaces for Wearable Robots.

Langlois K, Roels E, Van De Velde G, Espadinha C, Van Vlerken C, Verstraten T Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(6).

PMID: 33808626 PMC: 8003387. DOI: 10.3390/s21062157.


Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots-A Systematic Literature Review.

Bessler J, Prange-Lasonder G, Schulte R, Schaake L, Prinsen E, Buurke J Front Robot AI. 2021; 7:557606.

PMID: 33501319 PMC: 7805916. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.557606.


Mobile Mechatronic/Robotic Orthotic Devices to Assist-Rehabilitate Neuromotor Impairments in the Upper Limb: A Systematic and Synthetic Review.

Onose G, Popescu N, Munteanu C, Ciobanu V, Sporea C, Mirea M Front Neurosci. 2018; 12:577.

PMID: 30233289 PMC: 6134072. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00577.

References
1.
Ang K, Guan C, Phua K, Wang C, Zhou L, Tang K . Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke. Front Neuroeng. 2014; 7:30. PMC: 4114185. DOI: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00030. View

2.
Husemann B, Muller F, Krewer C, Heller S, Koenig E . Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2007; 38(2):349-54. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000254607.48765.cb. View

3.
van Kooten T, Whitesides J, von Recum A . Influence of silicone (PDMS) surface texture on human skin fibroblast proliferation as determined by cell cycle analysis. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998; 43(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199821)43:1<1::aid-jbm1>3.0.co;2-t. View

4.
Kim S, Park J, Jung M, Yoo E . Effects of Task-Oriented Training as an Added Treatment to Electromyogram-Triggered Neuromuscular Stimulation on Upper Extremity Function in Chronic Stroke Patients. Occup Ther Int. 2016; 23(2):165-74. DOI: 10.1002/oti.1421. View

5.
Masiero S, Armani M, Ferlini G, Rosati G, Rossi A . Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013; 28(4):377-86. DOI: 10.1177/1545968313513073. View