» Articles » PMID: 28476182

Assessing Reproductive Choices of Women and the Likelihood of Oocyte Cryopreservation in the Era of Elective Oocyte Freezing

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2017 May 7
PMID 28476182
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess reproductive choices of reproductive-age women in the United States and factors that influence consideration of elective egg freezing (EF).

Design: Cross-sectional internet-based survey.

Setting: Not applicable.

Patients: One thousand women aged 21-45 years.

Intervention(s): An anonymous 63-item self-administered questionnaire was distributed to a representative cross-section of women aged 21-45 years, stratified by age <35 years. One-half of the sample had at least one child, and the other one-half did not. All of the participants were interested in having children.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Ordinal logistic regression was performed to characterize the association of population characteristics and reproductive knowledge with likelihood to consider EF. Willingness to pay was assessed with the use of a linear prediction model that calculated dollar amounts at varying success rates.

Result(s): Overall, 87.2% of the sample reported awareness of EF for fertility preservation and 25% would consider this option, yet only 29.8% knew what the EF process entails. Once informed of the process, 30% of women changed their level of consideration. In a multivariable model, Asian race, single status, and infertility increased the likelihood of considering EF. Women likely to consider egg freezing would be willing to pay $3,811.55 (95% confidence interval $2,862.66-$4,760.44). If the total cost were $10,000, 91% of the cohort would accept at minimum a 50% chance of successful delivery.

Conclusion(s): This study is one of the largest cohorts of reproductive-age women in the United States addressing reproductive choices and factors associated with the importance of having a biologically related child and the likelihood of considering EF to preserve fertility. This study provides important insight into the willingness to pay for this elective endeavor.

Citing Articles

Clinical utilization and outcomes over eight consecutive years following oocyte cryopreservation.

Murugappan G, Sikder M, Vaccari S, Minjarez D, Tran N, Kim J J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 42(2):413-421.

PMID: 39633145 PMC: 11871152. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03334-z.


Fertility knowledge, childbearing intentions and attitudes towards social egg freezing: A study of female students of a private university in Kumasi, Ghana.

Osaah M, Damalie F, Amoah V, Senaya C, Dankluvi H, Yeboah B BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):553.

PMID: 39379906 PMC: 11459717. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03387-3.


Patient experience of social and medical fertility preservation fully reimbursed in France.

Hagege E, Pirtea P, Burette J, Canepa A, Graesslin O, de Ziegler D J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(10):2813-2822.

PMID: 39138766 PMC: 11534921. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03222-6.


Validation and measurement properties of the Male and Female Fertility Knowledge Inventories (MFKI and FFKI) in Iranian couples.

Mashayekh-Amiri S, Jafarabadi M, Molaie B, Rashidi F, Hemati E, Aliasghari F Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):57.

PMID: 38649965 PMC: 11572397. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01795-0.


Knowledge, attitude and practice on ovarian reserve function among women of childbearing age: a prospective cross-sectional study in Chongqing and surrounding regions.

Yuan Y, Yang L, Hu J, Deng Y, Zhang H BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e080890.

PMID: 38431304 PMC: 10910424. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080890.


References
1.
Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C, Karlstrom P, Tyden T . Attitudes toward parenthood and awareness of fertility among postgraduate students in Sweden. Gend Med. 2006; 3(3):187-95. DOI: 10.1016/s1550-8579(06)80207-x. View

2.
Cobo A, Diaz C . Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(2):277-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.030. View

3.
van Loendersloot L, Moolenaar L, Mol B, Repping S, van der Veen F, Goddijn M . Expanding reproductive lifespan: a cost-effectiveness study on oocyte freezing. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(11):3054-60. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der284. View

4.
Lundsberg L, Pal L, Gariepy A, Xu X, Chu M, Illuzzi J . Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding conception and fertility: a population-based survey among reproductive-age United States women. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(3):767-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.006. View

5.
Stoop D, Nekkebroeck J, Devroey P . A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(3):655-61. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq367. View