» Articles » PMID: 28473715

Rationally Co-targeting Divergent Pathways in KRAS Wild-type Colorectal Cancers by CANscript Technology Reveals Tumor Dependence on Notch and Erbb2

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 May 6
PMID 28473715
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

KRAS mutation status can distinguish between metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients who may benefit from therapies that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as cetuximab. However, patients whose tumors harbor mutant KRAS (codons 12/13, 61 and 146) are often excluded from EGFR-targeted regimens, while other patients with wild type KRAS will sometimes respond favorably to these same drugs. These conflicting observations suggest that a more robust approach to individualize therapy may enable greater frequency of positive clinical outcome for mCRC patients. Here, we utilized alive tumor tissues in ex-vivo platform termed CANscript, which preserves the native tumor heterogeneity, in order to interrogate the antitumor effects of EGFR-targeted drugs in mCRC (n = 40). We demonstrated that, irrespective of KRAS status, cetuximab did not induce an antitumor response in a majority of patient tumors. In the subset of non-responsive tumors, data showed that expression levels of EGFR ligands contributed to a mechanism of resistance. Transcriptomic and phosphoproteomic profiling revealed deregulation of multiple pathways, significantly the Notch and Erbb2. Targeting these nodes concurrently resulted in antitumor efficacy in a majority of cetuximab-resistant tumors. These findings highlight the importance of integrating molecular profile and functional testing tools for optimization of alternate strategies in resistant population.

Citing Articles

Mismatch repair-proficient tumor footprints in the sands of immune desert: mechanistic constraints and precision platforms.

Majumder B, Nataraj N, Maitreyi L, Datta S Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1414376.

PMID: 39100682 PMC: 11294168. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1414376.


Advancements in 3D In Vitro Models for Colorectal Cancer.

Vitale S, Calapa F, Colonna F, Luongo F, Biffoni M, De Maria R Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(32):e2405084.

PMID: 38962943 PMC: 11348154. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202405084.


Inhibition of the AURKA/YAP1 axis is a promising therapeutic option for overcoming cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer stem cells.

Rio-Vilarino A, Cenigaonandia-Campillo A, Garcia-Bautista A, Mateos-Gomez P, Schlaepfer M, Del Puerto-Nevado L Br J Cancer. 2024; 130(8):1402-1413.

PMID: 38467828 PMC: 11014903. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02649-z.


Use of patient-derived explants as a preclinical model for precision medicine in colorectal cancer: A scoping review.

Mui M, Clark M, Vu T, Clemons N, Hollande F, Roth S Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):392.

PMID: 37816905 PMC: 10564805. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03133-7.


Novel Models of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: The Future of Biomarker and Therapeutic Research.

Clark J, Fotopoulou C, Cunnea P, Krell J Front Oncol. 2022; 12:837233.

PMID: 35402223 PMC: 8990887. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.837233.


References
1.
Cavanaugh D, Chesler A, Jackson A, Sigal Y, Yamanaka H, Grant R . Trpv1 reporter mice reveal highly restricted brain distribution and functional expression in arteriolar smooth muscle cells. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(13):5067-77. PMC: 3087977. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6451-10.2011. View

2.
Venook A . Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted treatment for advanced colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2005; 103(12):2435-46. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21123. View

3.
Baker J, Dutta D, WATSON D, Maddala T, Munneke B, Shak S . Tumour gene expression predicts response to cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011; 104(3):488-95. PMC: 3049558. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606054. View

4.
Zanella E, Galimi F, Sassi F, Migliardi G, Cottino F, Leto S . IGF2 is an actionable target that identifies a distinct subpopulation of colorectal cancer patients with marginal response to anti-EGFR therapies. Sci Transl Med. 2015; 7(272):272ra12. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010445. View

5.
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha V, Mukherjee S, Ebert B, Gillette M . Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(43):15545-50. PMC: 1239896. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. View