» Articles » PMID: 28472152

Using Proximal Remote Sensing in Non-invasive Phenotyping of Invertebrates

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 May 5
PMID 28472152
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Proximal imaging remote sensing technologies are used to phenotype and to characterize organisms based on specific external body reflectance features. These imaging technologies are gaining interest and becoming more widely used and applied in ecological, systematic, evolutionary, and physiological studies of plants and also of animals. However, important factors may impact the quality and consistency of body reflectance features and therefore the ability to use these technologies as part of non-invasive phenotyping and characterization of organisms. We acquired hyperspectral body reflectance profiles from three insect species, and we examined how preparation procedures and preservation time affected the ability to detect reflectance responses to gender, origin, and age. Different portions of the radiometric spectrum varied markedly in their sensitivity to preparation procedures and preservation time. Based on studies of three insect species, we successfully identified specific radiometric regions, in which phenotypic traits become significantly more pronounced based on either: 1) gentle cleaning of museum specimens with distilled water, or 2) killing and preserving insect specimens in 70% ethanol. Standardization of killing and preservation procedures will greatly increase the ability to use proximal imaging remote sensing technologies as part of phenotyping and also when used in ecological and evolutionary studies of invertebrates.

Citing Articles

Penetration and scattering-Two optical phenomena to consider when applying proximal remote sensing technologies to object classifications.

Nansen C PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0204579.

PMID: 30300357 PMC: 6177154. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204579.


A method for real-time classification of insect vectors of mosaic and brown streak disease in cassava plants for future implementation within a low-cost, handheld, in-field multispectral imaging sensor.

Fennell J, Veys C, Dingle J, Nwezeobi J, van Brunschot S, Colvin J Plant Methods. 2018; 14:82.

PMID: 30250493 PMC: 6148801. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-018-0350-3.

References
1.
Nansen C . The potential and prospects of proximal remote sensing of arthropod pests. Pest Manag Sci. 2015; 72(4):653-9. DOI: 10.1002/ps.4209. View

2.
Teixeira R, Fernandez J, Pereira J, Monteiro L . Identification of Grapholita molesta (Busk) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Biotypes Using Infrared Spectroscopy. Neotrop Entomol. 2015; 44(2):129-33. DOI: 10.1007/s13744-015-0272-y. View

3.
Burleigh J, Alphonse K, Alverson A, Bik H, Blank C, Cirranello A . Next-generation phenomics for the Tree of Life. PLoS Curr. 2013; 5. PMC: 3697239. DOI: 10.1371/currents.tol.085c713acafc8711b2ff7010a4b03733. View

4.
Fiorani F, Schurr U . Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013; 64:267-91. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120137. View

5.
Chiao C, Wu W, Chen S, Yang E . Visualization of the spatial and spectral signals of orb-weaving spiders, Nephila pilipes, through the eyes of a honeybee. J Exp Biol. 2009; 212(Pt 14):2269-78. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.030734. View