Recommendations for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Prevention in Adult ICUs: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Overview
Emergency Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: Patients in the ICU are at the greatest risk of contracting healthcare-associated infections like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. This study calculates the cost-effectiveness of methicillin-resistant S aureus prevention strategies and recommends specific strategies based on screening test implementation.
Design: A cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model from the hospital perspective was conducted to determine if the implementation costs of methicillin-resistant S aureus prevention strategies are justified by associated reductions in methicillin-resistant S aureus infections and improvements in quality-adjusted life years. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses determined the influence of input variation on the cost-effectiveness.
Setting: ICU.
Patients: Hypothetical cohort of adults admitted to the ICU.
Interventions: Three prevention strategies were evaluated, including universal decolonization, targeted decolonization, and screening and isolation. Because prevention strategies have a screening component, the screening test in the model was varied to reflect commonly used screening test categories, including conventional culture, chromogenic agar, and polymerase chain reaction.
Measurements And Main Results: Universal and targeted decolonization are less costly and more effective than screening and isolation. This is consistent for all screening tests. When compared with targeted decolonization, universal decolonization is cost-saving to cost-effective, with maximum cost savings occurring when a hospital uses more expensive screening tests like polymerase chain reaction. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: As compared with screening and isolation, the current standard practice in ICUs, targeted decolonization, and universal decolonization are less costly and more effective. This supports updating the standard practice to a decolonization approach.
Inagawa T, Hisatsune J, Kutsuno S, Iwao Y, Koba Y, Kashiyama S Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(6):e0295023.
PMID: 38709078 PMC: 11237438. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02950-23.
Paoletti M, Marcellusi A, Yang J, Mennini F Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2023; 10:18-28.
PMID: 37070067 PMC: 10105322. DOI: 10.33393/grhta.2023.2488.
Mennini F, Paoletti M, Bini C, Marcellusi A, Falcone M, Andreoni M Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2023; 9:45-57.
PMID: 36628307 PMC: 9768596. DOI: 10.33393/grhta.2022.2287.
Yang J, Naik J, Massello M, Ralph L, Dillon R Infect Dis Ther. 2022; 11(4):1443-1457.
PMID: 35334080 PMC: 9334485. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00607-x.
Iragorri N, Spackman E Public Health Rev. 2018; 39:17.
PMID: 30009081 PMC: 6043991. DOI: 10.1186/s40985-018-0093-8.