Evaluation of the Marginal Fit of CAD-CAM Zirconia Copings: Comparison of 2D and 3D Measurement Methods
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal fit of zirconia copings by using 2 different measurement methods: a triple optical scan method and a silicone replica method.
Material And Methods: Sixty zirconia copings fabricated by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) systems were studied for the marginal fit. For the replica method, the thickness of the light-body silicone layer of the discrepancy was assessed using light microscopy and image analysis software. The triple-scan optical method was performed to obtain a digital three-dimensional map of the marginal fit and analyzed marginal fit measurement values. For each method, the reliability of the measurement was tested, and a nonparametric analysis was then performed to compare the marginal fit values as measured by the 2 evaluation methods (α=.05).
Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients and repeatability coefficients revealed good repeatability for both of the evaluation methods. However, the triple-scan method produced a smaller marginal fit than the replica method (P<.001) for the entire group studied.
Conclusions: Although both methods showed good repeatability, the triple-scan method was more reliable.
Fayed A, Azer A, AboElHassan R BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):58.
PMID: 39799312 PMC: 11725217. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05325-z.
Daou E, Salameh P J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024; 24(2):201-207.
PMID: 38650346 PMC: 11129817. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_429_23.
Shely A, Lugassy D, Anufriev M, Nissan J, Rauchwerger O, Ben-Izhack G Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(3).
PMID: 38534285 PMC: 10969533. DOI: 10.3390/dj12030061.
Nagi N, Fouda A, Bourauel C BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):207.
PMID: 37029396 PMC: 10082505. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02857-8.
Arora O, Ahmed N, Maiti S J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2023; 13(Suppl 1):S238-S242.
PMID: 36643161 PMC: 9836134. DOI: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_210_22.